* [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana
@ 2019-09-20 16:12 Tomas Mozes
2019-09-20 16:36 ` Joonas Niilola
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Mozes @ 2019-09-20 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --]
Hi there,
while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch Linux
uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a new uid/gid
be taken or it's safe to assume no one will mix kibana with qmail?
Thanks,
Tomas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 332 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana
2019-09-20 16:12 [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana Tomas Mozes
@ 2019-09-20 16:36 ` Joonas Niilola
2019-09-20 16:43 ` Tomas Mozes
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Niilola @ 2019-09-20 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hey,
On 9/20/19 7:12 PM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
> Hi there,
> while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch
> Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a
> new uid/gid be taken or it's safe to assume no one will mix kibana
> with qmail?
>
>
I can't find this info anywhere. There's a pull request currently open
for acct-*/qmail stuff, that seems to reserve 200+ for it (like shown in
uid-gid.txt). Nothing seems to reserve 183 as far as I can tell?
- https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/api.git/tree/files/uid-gid.txt
-
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12898/files#diff-bb8c77449e92c212844f37fc9a56e12aL105
-- juippis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana
2019-09-20 16:36 ` Joonas Niilola
@ 2019-09-20 16:43 ` Tomas Mozes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Mozes @ 2019-09-20 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 936 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
>
> On 9/20/19 7:12 PM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch
> > Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a
> > new uid/gid be taken or it's safe to assume no one will mix kibana
> > with qmail?
> >
> >
> I can't find this info anywhere. There's a pull request currently open
> for acct-*/qmail stuff, that seems to reserve 200+ for it (like shown in
> uid-gid.txt). Nothing seems to reserve 183 as far as I can tell?
>
> - https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/api.git/tree/files/uid-gid.txt
>
> -
>
> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12898/files#diff-bb8c77449e92c212844f37fc9a56e12aL105
>
>
> -- juippis
>
>
>
Oh I'm sorry, I'm also working on elasticsearch which will have uid/gid
183. Kibana in Arch uses uid 206 and that conflicts with qmails.
Tomas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1671 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-20 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-20 16:12 [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana Tomas Mozes
2019-09-20 16:36 ` Joonas Niilola
2019-09-20 16:43 ` Tomas Mozes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox