From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCBAB138334 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57CC8E08EC; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AB9EE089D for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id u184so7966032qkd.4 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:43:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=97r+s1GKXculdJpK43ngHdIhMb+/+crFseMhlRFCFfk=; b=uute97lu8KZ5aLXwTN9yERqh6DnZPNNJoEXugiEKXesHQN0wHqUz3O3r0N/GKURhSm xCxC8Sv+scNvOnQ8lpNByl3u88TxSEd/lQskHHHf1Lo0XjAOP02y06exR3gGuDhqRDnD tGYOcs1gGLyezF9yL2RuRYoKWYC6/1kklItIbAGkPvCEfwknLHaN9w/j/ruWGhedFlnF eax0ulQQBkDyEwmGd/M4FETkj85ORzukpglTK2Mfz6I/JMc8t+xL79W86Uzq+ReN+nZM FwCi2PBNyu3OvQY7qVI3kek9x2SJNSgCoJ+zl2ZeiO8FlHJD1Aj7nM9lUEql7mFQAZD5 G9vA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=97r+s1GKXculdJpK43ngHdIhMb+/+crFseMhlRFCFfk=; b=Mje6mfoDgK3DX2ib6+gnEyXcnscA67LwZjnCgT1ENpy7suB2+8/IbxhDK7eX32aIG7 tezqCgvih3F1R0vWVqZgST1MExA5cn2azLAJgB23bDv5NBG1AYp5NWaDdL7XpsMS2+LJ JvG4U7qLiVeyFcMcYxdmM+ayxlXkdy5j71eFntUK8ZtqEUttND17fOryD94IbuKPlZk4 dXW38esn39ExHAfJ9cDImawIaJ4sf+oI0GtIdViQzl6sGjgkNSnnGS1zSDSKCCmyUji5 VZEnGCCNeT/ymv3oTQlxNUuNdwPVJIQU1HO2xcOpm0+bHnGkN8rqvJxSEFFuDCG8XkAQ KU6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWnH2o8ShleRBwPXJIoJKaAwjTxUGtRAWmnzW/bO671uOlcIds3 lYVoxeEjJCV2ucRHgzzS6Mlxttin4EbA+MxKY6OiNA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqytFw5wv6/zD8KgyENEv+mJ29mhCSmv9t+NoBjSKfM/gY3qBh1tyFxEFwzFsSf5XYv+PscAmqzwXCm2h8KdLlE= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e817:: with SMTP id a23mr4543745qkg.294.1568997780095; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Tomas Mozes Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 18:43:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] UID/GID assignment for kibana To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000056046a0592fec34a" X-Archives-Salt: 4d841f63-211f-4834-b9b3-22daeb37ca9f X-Archives-Hash: 793b656c63ba89b297de0e03c40c5905 --00000000000056046a0592fec34a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > > On 9/20/19 7:12 PM, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > Hi there, > > while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch > > Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should a > > new uid/gid be taken or it's safe to assume no one will mix kibana > > with qmail? > > > > > I can't find this info anywhere. There's a pull request currently open > for acct-*/qmail stuff, that seems to reserve 200+ for it (like shown in > uid-gid.txt). Nothing seems to reserve 183 as far as I can tell? > > - https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/api.git/tree/files/uid-gid.txt > > - > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12898/files#diff-bb8c77449e92c212844f37fc9a56e12aL105 > > > -- juippis > > > Oh I'm sorry, I'm also working on elasticsearch which will have uid/gid 183. Kibana in Arch uses uid 206 and that conflicts with qmails. Tomas --00000000000056046a0592fec34a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:36 PM Joona= s Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org&= gt; wrote:
Hey,<= br>

On 9/20/19 7:12 PM, Tomas Mozes wrote:
> Hi there,
> while trying to implement glep 81 for kibana I found out that Arch > Linux uses uid 183 for it, but it's taken by qmail.eclass. Should = a
> new uid/gid be taken or it's safe to assume no one will mix kibana=
> with qmail?
>
>
I can't find this info anywhere. There's a pull request currently o= pen
for acct-*/qmail stuff, that seems to reserve 200+ for it (like shown in uid-gid.txt). Nothing seems to reserve 183 as far as I can tell?

=C2=A0=C2=A0- https://gitweb.gentoo.org= /data/api.git/tree/files/uid-gid.txt

=C2=A0=C2=A0-
https://g= ithub.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12898/files#diff-bb8c77449e92c212844f37fc9a56e= 12aL105


-- juippis



Oh I'm sorry, I'm also working= on elasticsearch which will have uid/gid 183. Kibana in Arch uses uid 206 = and that conflicts with qmails.

Tomas
--00000000000056046a0592fec34a--