From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5AF139694 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9114E0CB7; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A03E0BA4 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id s64so9952008pgb.1 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:22:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=rrm/BghtfolYgB5cXj9k7FbU3qjY4Av7bnIKJB7MG3U=; b=gkdMHQQ5rOoxM3aIG386y9rAsTz8p7Ok/3JSg5/VNOn5S486HBsB/RxayszYRk7PbY 5xFka86voL98veSFKFLKL0oXAZNeZUs0NCSnKMFSD3xDzFKLPiIRd4b6/oz290Zf1Dwv vjftImL9bha7t2BHC2HQ3fv85EOOvXI5ibP+SCRi6sDriAVB9Lwk9/kXx1ElFStvzW7W /3bfleo+MUAWUgWsb9SA2X/RKPkcwhysqman8tx5W9HJM/m1UFXephYiAzpF2VXFguiY EJz+WALT2QAdP+jSvDYhSzTJ/3TsYYj265Nz0PXtaRM4MnRGyHsWQjESWS/8c1CaIQl4 TcJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=rrm/BghtfolYgB5cXj9k7FbU3qjY4Av7bnIKJB7MG3U=; b=X+Xa48+RT96TkHGEiXpjSKEIr/mUG6wjIcYkmpR2RgTGvv2r0GR6J2SAturWOrAMGL 7OT4pWAdpeNXBzx8Dvr9Vs39p4uH3aWbZf4yq8n87ssDYFI5QpAsjItEKLmopaqqDLy2 k/G2K+d36KdcA9vNsOIklihQEQgVOsll2+BXwu3qT3INMqn9RSyKYZkdQ4l3wV8RFTy4 84wLml1JI02D+m//BUjd+Hv1zl6+6AShGuS7dJxKunHGKjs4t3DYk3QtA3CGclltp35A lnnrMnnvDUnS4ZsQWxvnMlfCHhUTYKxEYIO6ZYpa2w9O2olVMqOu2AcSRptxwEDOtZat 5E/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4SB1V5Va74Ucoff7GoEqAxcBgv8FyLzR/3ktkacl1+ys8swMzA 7M4PBhfkrXXmkRa3x79SFAuSqU1eaAzB X-Received: by 10.99.42.19 with SMTP id q19mr2043434pgq.233.1492593726354; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:22:06 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.135.8 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:22:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tomas Mozes Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:22:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11468eb6da7c6f054d818ea8 X-Archives-Salt: 8f477813-655f-4c05-aa76-7e1b4f0df71d X-Archives-Hash: a73c8b691bb9a8cb3ca5f62e9cbd655e --001a11468eb6da7c6f054d818ea8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:31 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible < joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible < > > joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: > >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=3D= 1 > >> > >> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for m= e. > >> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because > >> there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and one > >> unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc > >> > >> Can someone shed some light on this? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> J=C3=B6rg > >> > >> > >> > > You did mean 5.4.0-r3, right? > > Right. And James found the reason why was not in the stable branch. > > Cheers, > J=C3=B6rg > > > It is stable. Even there are open bugs, arches started stabilizing it. What do you get when you run: # emerge -pv =3Dsys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3 --001a11468eb6da7c6f054d818ea8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:31 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible &= lt;joer= g.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
Tomas Mozes wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible <
> joerg.schaible@bpm-i= nspire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
>> https://gitweb.gento= o.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=3D1
>>
>> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable f= or me.
>> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, beca= use
>> there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and o= ne
>> unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
>>
>> Can someone shed some light on this?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> J=C3=B6rg
>>
>>
>>
> You did mean 5.4.0-r3, right?

Right. And James found the reason why was not in the stable bra= nch.

Cheers,
J=C3=B6rg



It is stable. Even there are open bugs= , arches started stabilizing it.

What do you get when you= run:
# emerge -pv =3Dsys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3

--001a11468eb6da7c6f054d818ea8--