From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC08B139694 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE38D21C075; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8985F21C054 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id 63so20196601pgh.0 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 05:44:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iW49I5jAvide+A8yWmx8SLb4vxb4oeGAMaS2zno1VwE=; b=CblizCsf/0t1zqmQs9SnySgqpkfDluAR3mHgfvg+pk1mCi/Akvncd2T99YrAts8J02 nGgvUd1MXrIyI60dcSD0CQ3nJhF22p62BziD9d6a5LhnxHFsrlxDcPvt6Cu904gKgg6R 2o9+hN5jMF4fgX0xNrtm3pxQMZm4wU9IosrRs7iygfs80z32P92BnyFltl1zswO0ur1x sHNfZ0KX/LvVfKht95ZL3PMyIXyoKIBzgL6o8repKmj3yw2ERxERblcm2aaPbNbebde/ aMl/gEBypJbg2FpjJjq6iOU7bRJCogIjDRvOCprVzRON4pvnG84bJ36RINLUbLPCrveW vd0g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=iW49I5jAvide+A8yWmx8SLb4vxb4oeGAMaS2zno1VwE=; b=K+Lh6IK7DZlpXS1e+gRCDnckPUhi8cMfPJc3hFEupdotvBEB29krNJY6homYDwbDXR IykkAd8qL/ogGhBwOnyFdOxKC4zQkctq2DSmLP9AjBoy7l+EPtZSiZR4ArpAwKTfDVVM j/HbWm41sCY5QOG8ZTOWw5+I1gu8fc62LjBmPxLDCEZ01KZlYpChFlJTZeL27md4yhnj U4kQRun3ukMAqDP4RxZKlzMm10nVnHftnOAx3lfMVKwwBBrDXoK74voTSzg0gU5Ty5nN 9XXaT05HB/gWcCYX7BKW/dy+nZhZrCpMOnEJfCTnLaG/Pqmf7R15VZh6Y/lh4ef9iwc0 D3eA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7DF7sTJz/pP3+9OCTMno49zslRPBoLzJZzWqWTlWB4Ui+GNFGX J42cnFzWNMSb5LoI4ib8Q3+iwWmQKQ== X-Received: by 10.84.178.1 with SMTP id y1mr23443509plb.60.1492519497435; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 05:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.135.8 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 05:44:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tomas Mozes Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:44:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ?? To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c13ee8c770f51054d704634 X-Archives-Salt: 98b59557-0bba-4d85-99a3-3c8d7543f4af X-Archives-Hash: 406910786ece2b60fc05ea3bc9d42d3d --94eb2c13ee8c770f51054d704634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible < joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Hi Tomas, > > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible < > > joerg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: > >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=3D= 1 > >> > >> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for m= e. > >> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because > >> there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and one > >> unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc > >> > >> Can someone shed some light on this? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> J=C3=B6rg > >> > >> > >> > > On which platform do you have it unstable? The packages problem is > > probably related to: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D612178 > > Amd64. > > Yes, it might be the same problem. The ebuild for gcc-4.5.0-r3 on my > machine > lists amd64 as unstable after synching the tree while the ebuild availabl= e > over packages.gentoo.org has a stable version in KEYWORDS. > > Even if some GIT mirrors might be out of sync, it does not explain why > https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc lists the same version > more than once. > > Cheers, > J=C3=B6rg > > > As mentioned by others, bugs on packages.gentoo.org will not affect your portage tree. I've just installed gcc 5.4.0-r3 on amd64, so try syncing your portage tree. Don't you have it in your package.mask? --94eb2c13ee8c770f51054d704634 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:16 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible = <joe= rg.schaible@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
Hi Tomas,

Tomas Mozes wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, J=C3=B6rg Schaible <
> joerg.schaible@bpm-i= nspire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
>> https://gitweb.gento= o.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=3D1
>>
>> However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable f= or me.
>> Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, beca= use
>> there seem to be two 4.5.0-r3 versions, one stable for amd64 and o= ne
>> unstable: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-devel/gcc
>>
>> Can someone shed some light on this?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> J=C3=B6rg
>>
>>
>>
> On which platform do you have it unstable? The packages problem is
> probably related to:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D= 612178

Amd64.

Yes, it might be the same problem. The ebuild for gcc-4.5.0-r3 on my machin= e
lists amd64 as unstable after synching the tree while the ebuild available<= br> over packages.gentoo.org has a stable version in KEYWORDS.

Even if some GIT mirrors might be out of sync, it does not explain why
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-deve= l/gcc lists the same version
more than once.

Cheers,
J=C3=B6rg



As mentioned by oth= ers, bugs on packages.gentoo.org= will not affect your portage tree. I've just installed gcc 5.4.0-r3 on= amd64, so try syncing your portage tree. Don't you have it in your pac= kage.mask?
--94eb2c13ee8c770f51054d704634--