From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97578138A91 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3693B21C007; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 201B5E0511 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l13so2504651wie.4 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:02:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zQUOpzIZV20f1KEsazsHhvprCYpEHnPTgg7c3RdosI4=; b=iS6Ur+Jo7NMKfhFdT6X5itM8UgISGpoITXK/mhPzLrMss+l3+vlW7zpg18iH6qB4fR oAmcF54GPfl7VOPtVBTGjpb21YozByY8ewveKRuSXQwJ70GczY+rGmV7BD4EzwHJWfHN MaYVTU4vApp5BudnPX3xnnE1dJ6IZZvOxMeNPCwmXUpSlRnhH3oFedtz6Te84l1LxdW1 CcLPgs4MpzhlEDS0jCXDSNTlXWmVByKXXqgE/non8k0gJGGHfsOR2IeMJmiEBA5oCHDb dGIHVD37sxQtQu5uAd2HYydmRy0rksrCuY75rfUTH4kCNxo4NWMX1QwlEtQHm6OxlZDT kipQ== X-Received: by 10.180.74.131 with SMTP id t3mr12475113wiv.23.1361048535739; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:02:15 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.155.68 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:01:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130216193143.1493.qmail@stuge.se> References: <5117560B.3090709@gentoo.org> <5117C8B4.50802@gentoo.org> <511B903A.8000301@gentoo.org> <511D64CC.9030505@gentoo.org> <511D678D.5070006@gentoo.org> <511F226B.9070001@gentoo.org> <511F8F16.2090508@flameeyes.eu> <511FDDD9.2030200@flameeyes.eu> <20130216193143.1493.qmail@stuge.se> From: Markos Chandras Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:01:55 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1hg2Hj6n_e7qrscQib-tUacJJpU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Firmware cleanup, part #1 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 81e44a2c-5566-4261-a340-9d5736572b25 X-Archives-Hash: 72c58d0d929fe2d6d3ac89cd8005a01e On 16 February 2013 19:31, Peter Stuge wrote: > Diego Elio Petten=F2 wrote: >> > So because we did things badly in the past, that is an excuse to >> > do things badly in the future? :) >> >> No. I still argue that this is NOT doing things badly. >> Masking a package will NOT cause it to get unmerged by default. > > Hm, can you expand on "by default" ? > > When will it get unmerged then? > > > //Peter > I guess when nothing else depends on it or it is not in your world file --=20 Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang