From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9707B138010 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 188D221C067; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05E321C1AC for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:17:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j6so1767515oag.40 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qhL29uCPGErySNPxqTkq3k7UvOS8Bnyym6iRbAIbF4g=; b=fLjuM15o0y5R0I6EAxufdvh0+3zuwJSLplvn4FyK1bnOh+akWHZbtuH3akhpJoLiGu Mr7VeZz2qXy5xG81Pg4hD5Trr6urbnpTJt9yEDoB/6+A6jFVX5MH7/Cx1BeyDkNdCAIA +wEKbnW5/UOxQ85laD5rFIjScjeBhEIRzuW0M5tSBPBsEsqmUcmI98Ove15STKQ2onMB V6Jzug2TpUfg02C+opIPHKv2rIDCLXxYGo2i5A/qTk9hFj9lw6dHt/HjdfUJkd02bz4m +uYG4tY1YaTLsCyNJ6pse+faHtqTGCIaR9TFRf+pBLtLhoKd+S22TZ6ZUhrBWvQHGN9I Nptg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.131.100 with SMTP id ol4mr31229522obb.38.1351711078154; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.151.8 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5091456A.4030307@gentoo.org> References: <20121030190839.A9A3D21600@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20121030165621.5441b0d6@gentoo.org> <50903117.5020502@gentoo.org> <20121030170807.12fdb04b@gentoo.org> <20121030211802.749e4ef3@pomiocik.lan> <20121031115749.73885615@gentoo.org> <20121031160909.674d542a@pomiocik.lan> <5091456A.4030307@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:17:58 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yBYeKOLnP43ZoaO2Wk3Xe121hGs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: udev.eclass From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 352a22e0-deb2-4f39-ae00-ba18de2a97ad X-Archives-Hash: 0072ecca85c358a3416590fb09559706 On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Samuli Suominen wro= te: > On 31/10/12 17:09, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:57:49 -0300 >> Alexis Ballier wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:18:02 +0100 >>> Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >>> [...] >>>> >>>> Don't even try to touch any of my eclasses without prior asking. >>> >>> >>> A bit aggressive but its rather obvious that this is the norm not the >>> exception, meaning the argument 'I do not want to diverge from >>> $other eclass' is moot. >> >> >> It's aggressive because Samuli has a history of touching (and sometimes >> breaking) other people's packages without even asking or pinging that >> he did that, and believing he's above all the rules here. >> > > You don't know me clearly, that's definately the opposite of what I'm doi= ng > and intending to do, walking the fine line and bothering people only when > something real changes... > > Breaking? Hardly, since I never commit untested code, and the exceptions > I've fixed myself usually very quickly as I'm watching incoming bugs, > forums, and more > > I'm being cooperative with you and keeping udev.eclass with systemd.eclas= s > sort of 'in sync' due to the nature of both > packages being from the same tarball. What more do you want? Seriously. > Please stop _NOW_. The thread is about the eclass review. Either comment on that or go flame somewhere else. Did he break your eclass this time or is this a preemptive complain just in case he does in the future? --=20 Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2