From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59440-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BE1138010
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:14:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C1B4E1068;
Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 663D4E0EDE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:14:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o45so1996519wer.8
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=ZrhGWyBqIPSl+nVok9sRaOvUVXBuBDV/nL+vIc+NDc0=;
b=paODbUD+xm1X5UXGdDoEdh+Y/VYEV9rCfa7nljxQUIyNDAPR3lgv8bbKW/WXQNozJn
M5rqKrZ55zQf40QCnJO73+dnU+UgQn1lsE9GTqmV8MFF/SBsMrxfgjnk5tqTpNW+n7Hx
yfpSOfWpewNDRdOdWXCQQkyicAVicitfYt3x8Ls4SnKRZwyRlF68h7N3wwzWUsNKcH9q
im31xhv7cWKfrw2OepUbQiD7gcmM2TswjjiMRTNYpH2ssGv4WH9+3PlooEgQiSt68xyI
ukvreEZGc9fQFZaJNFSJ7iiyJEnqdvrmUr43J7twzo71S6r66o1KMItZxnkvzOVjmfbh
BaFw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.103.40 with SMTP id ft8mr11757731wib.28.1364847257057;
Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5159E5BC.1090908@gmail.com>
References: <515571D8.7030008@gentoo.org>
<5155749A.5010302@flameeyes.eu>
<51557B1B.9020408@gentoo.org>
<51557D48.5010008@flameeyes.eu>
<51558704.20904@gentoo.org>
<20130331010601.GA965@ca.inter.net>
<51578EC0.60004@gentoo.org>
<20130331142227.GA937@ca.inter.net>
<20130401015653.GB912@ca.inter.net>
<CAG2jQ8gAf+V57ZiKpTcUaE_7R7bXzuDnRzTvcBz2K_fvWzQ9Gg@mail.gmail.com>
<20130401153218.GA904@ca.inter.net>
<CAG2jQ8jBf-wGDuahn6qhtjTgmv=2EUYW5EL=UWg6syvqGRXG-Q@mail.gmail.com>
<5159E5BC.1090908@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 21:14:16 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: wiXWNH6iREv_zZNi0BC-lXyismc
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8jqcscgRQ6GiYu-w+DJFO+M+xgMdHz7_Wk3xFb5hgTHFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt
: SOLVED
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7
X-Archives-Salt: 61601ee9-1bc3-45ba-bd13-accc61f121d8
X-Archives-Hash: 17d3c78aff6e2849cbf28834022f4648
--f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb <purslow@ca.inter.net> wrote:
> >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb <purslow@ca.inter.net> wrote:
> >>>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this
problem.
> >>>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry.
> >>> So you broke the threading on the original email,
> >>> you deleted all the previous content,
> >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail
> >>> and then you claim you solved a problem
> >>> without mentioning what the problem was.
> >>
> >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite.
> >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation
> >> & help other users who may face the same problem,
> >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list.
> >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented,
> >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible.
> >>
> >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list :
> >>
> >
> > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to
> > gentoo-dev just to
> > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even
> > mentioning the title.
> > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok
>
> Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And
> has been for almost a year?
>
I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion. We are aware of that.
The bug is still open
--f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<p><br>
On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, "Michael Mol" <<a href="mailto:mikemol@gmail.com">mikemol@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:<br>
> > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb <<a href="mailto:purslow@ca.inter.net">purslow@ca.inter.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote:<br>
> >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb <<a href="mailto:purslow@ca.inter.net">purslow@ca.inter.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> >>>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem.<br>
> >>>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry.<br>
> >>> So you broke the threading on the original email,<br>
> >>> you deleted all the previous content,<br>
> >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail<br>
> >>> and then you claim you solved a problem<br>
> >>> without mentioning what the problem was.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite.<br>
> >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation<br>
> >> & help other users who may face the same problem,<br>
> >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list.<br>
> >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented,<br>
> >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list :<br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
> > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to<br>
> > gentoo-dev just to<br>
> > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even<br>
> > mentioning the title.<br>
> > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok<br>
><br>
> Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And<br>
> has been for almost a year?<br>
><br>
I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion. We are aware of that. The bug is still open</p>
--f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7--