From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BE1138010 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C1B4E1068; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 663D4E0EDE for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 20:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o45so1996519wer.8 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZrhGWyBqIPSl+nVok9sRaOvUVXBuBDV/nL+vIc+NDc0=; b=paODbUD+xm1X5UXGdDoEdh+Y/VYEV9rCfa7nljxQUIyNDAPR3lgv8bbKW/WXQNozJn M5rqKrZ55zQf40QCnJO73+dnU+UgQn1lsE9GTqmV8MFF/SBsMrxfgjnk5tqTpNW+n7Hx yfpSOfWpewNDRdOdWXCQQkyicAVicitfYt3x8Ls4SnKRZwyRlF68h7N3wwzWUsNKcH9q im31xhv7cWKfrw2OepUbQiD7gcmM2TswjjiMRTNYpH2ssGv4WH9+3PlooEgQiSt68xyI ukvreEZGc9fQFZaJNFSJ7iiyJEnqdvrmUr43J7twzo71S6r66o1KMItZxnkvzOVjmfbh BaFw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.103.40 with SMTP id ft8mr11757731wib.28.1364847257057; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:14:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5159E5BC.1090908@gmail.com> References: <515571D8.7030008@gentoo.org> <5155749A.5010302@flameeyes.eu> <51557B1B.9020408@gentoo.org> <51557D48.5010008@flameeyes.eu> <51558704.20904@gentoo.org> <20130331010601.GA965@ca.inter.net> <51578EC0.60004@gentoo.org> <20130331142227.GA937@ca.inter.net> <20130401015653.GB912@ca.inter.net> <20130401153218.GA904@ca.inter.net> <5159E5BC.1090908@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 21:14:16 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wiXWNH6iREv_zZNi0BC-lXyismc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7 X-Archives-Salt: 61601ee9-1bc3-45ba-bd13-accc61f121d8 X-Archives-Hash: 17d3c78aff6e2849cbf28834022f4648 --f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, "Michael Mol" wrote: > > On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb wrote: > >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: > >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb wrote: > >>>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. > >>>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. > >>> So you broke the threading on the original email, > >>> you deleted all the previous content, > >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail > >>> and then you claim you solved a problem > >>> without mentioning what the problem was. > >> > >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. > >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation > >> & help other users who may face the same problem, > >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. > >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, > >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. > >> > >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : > >> > > > > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to > > gentoo-dev just to > > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even > > mentioning the title. > > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok > > Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And > has been for almost a year? > I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion. We are aware of that. The bug is still open --f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Apr 1, 2013 8:53 PM, "Michael Mol" <mikemol@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2013 01:06 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb <purslow@ca.inter.net> wrote:
> >> 130401 Markos Chandras wrote:
> >>> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb <purslow@ca.inter.net> wrote:
> >>>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem.
> >>>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry.
> >>> So you broke the threading on the original email,
> >>> you deleted all the previous content,
> >>> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail
> >>> and then you claim you solved a problem
> >>> without mentioning what the problem was.
> >>
> >> Your response is completely out of place & very impolite.
> >> I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation
> >> & help other users who may face the same problem,
> >> but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list.
> >> I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented,
> >> but I haven't criticised the developer responsible.
> >>
> >> Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list :
> >>
> >
> > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to
> > gentoo-dev just to
> > inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even
> > mentioning the title.
> > And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok
>
> Is this a good time to point out that list archival is still broken? And
> has been for almost a year?
>
I don't see how this is relevant to this discussion. We are aware of that. The bug is still open

--f46d044282acee009c04d95243d7--