From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59323-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F381138010
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:01:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36819E0678;
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:01:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B96DE058F
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:01:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 15so1123437wgd.7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=G4gzDglfgDpL4zRDZ4GEbvet9XcsaTrLopYPK6d15pA=;
b=DVLckpMJS2aMGDt0NzrhtqP5Bf4f7SmgdjKR3M1O9vXzhw2fdqxtk0ADFTh0ZFoP8i
rSXfWGdugYXEhu5gIZCodou1QXSc5xC+qmdbNCfVmzwQKF37IYS3lIh0/k+hYi1F4kFS
bl2xh4rtkjopdXOETRnYEvpY8mb3Oee0HF2yu0dz1Ehd8I5OhL28cYdkmGoHFjzDZFcy
JHHlITswjm+LIxxFbZp9KZt0sTgaba91ZDyoh8z/89knTuyRuMRmiYpObXxbNtZnf8xi
iiY60dOIrtLDtSGgPu8/DBdcAQejTywrXe8S6tMjcdUADlrXGpbe67FtP8x5K+0sKvP2
q0FQ==
X-Received: by 10.181.11.164 with SMTP id ej4mr19612861wid.29.1364238101623;
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <kiq0ik$f2v$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <514CE62A.4090605@gentoo.org> <kilfpu$eut$1@ger.gmane.org>
<CAG2jQ8i+1cLa14Pd-VYyudFVnFv9yJGgc+t+rkrHWUFwm2z7DA@mail.gmail.com>
<kilka6$i2v$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAG2jQ8jkDv8o2ty=of_x+CmRwkbxqmxzRfgNp_Dd8GLkMc5NvA@mail.gmail.com>
<kimrvo$11i$1@ger.gmane.org> <514F1120.7080001@gentoo.org>
<CAEdQ38EuDSVFWGi+EPxcoC13RxR8cDvoG5KoEnehUcBwvy-+yg@mail.gmail.com>
<kinouq$v8a$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAG2jQ8i=E5gEo6p6Xr-EUj6AAACdpRdY0SNPPtPc=0ckXTd+eQ@mail.gmail.com>
<kiq0ik$f2v$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 19:01:21 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: qWU5BpEKZvTZHLCLwlq0xoz1jCU
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8jEpL4cMYRdnGpTY97BbMuqAe4ounSOwD3Yf8c3Ab0bFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: ab327f6c-72aa-4324-95fa-25823567da49
X-Archives-Hash: 0cfc3740867fbbe59eb3db75ced96b96
On 25 March 2013 17:12, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras" <realnc@gmail.com
>> <mailto:realnc@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras
>> <hwoarang@gentoo.org <mailto:hwoarang@gentoo.org>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
>> >>> discussion again?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it
>> >> could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future
>> >> hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy.
>> >
>> >
>> > Well, even though I wasn't happy to see tvtime getting tree-cleaned,
>> I understand that Gentoo doesn't work with hired packagers. This isn't
>> Ubuntu or RedHat Linux. Gentoo packagers don't maintain what they're
>> not interested in.
>> >
>> > In the end it's another program that will end up in my ~/bin directory.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Why? Don't you want to work with me and maintain it together? Why keep
>> it working just for you?
>
>
> I can do that. Though the current ebuild seems to work just fine. There's
> no "alsa" USE flag and it builds with automake 1.13.
>
>
I don't know what you mean by this: "there is no alsa" use flag
~$ grep alsa tvtime-1.0.2_p20110131-r3.ebuild
http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/distfiles/${PN}-1.0.2-alsamixer-r1.patch
http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/distfiles/${PN}-1.0.2-alsa-r1.patch
http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/distfiles/${PN}-1.0.2-alsa-fixes.patch"
IUSE="alsa nls xinerama"
alsa? ( media-libs/alsa-lib )
if use alsa; then
epatch "${DISTDIR}/${PN}-1.0.2-alsa-r1.patch"
epatch "${DISTDIR}/${PN}-1.0.2-alsamixer-r1.patch"
epatch "${DISTDIR}/${PN}-1.0.2-alsa-fixes.patch"
So there is an "alsa" use flag and it does apply quite a lot of
patches in there. So the open bug is not fixed yet. Could you have a
look?
As for the automate thing. Yes it builds with the latest one so I
closed the bug.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang