From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4C1138010 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B576E0D84; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398A4E0CAB for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m15so2311514wgh.27 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VuxsRqdcBL5UJgZlqMtXM7Hr4V5I47l4eZXOaU9ao2o=; b=y53aRNXgdxSJMlLP1phvpHYn2zQ6hGCBD4LYPwlcybaJz5dCTjHuLNHQKkbtGtxiIH y+R15uy+2u13a1G6JmRR7vrp2edHeNsQwCuf20GWBTzrZZ//+Dpw10VTL2FRxm5b48lf X8ZYfPdC+KPTj72rnvBDE2ABwAjQAGKbK/OUQQ8uztGDXYA3YFGLdewK2P1qRQlddlqm L3KzIZb59YPatLE5i8/HRIiTQnMLN5vOhVmLTqTdKzC3dtPj3uT1qsm2YC/A1NcM9SF2 ASHvuq+II91sT31gi0NS5vThZpsZfJjfHElzpW24GkGHe1ZoKn5diIq8LqUlJfDWlu8A EdJw== X-Received: by 10.181.11.164 with SMTP id ej4mr11044661wid.29.1364836054792; Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10:06:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130401153218.GA904@ca.inter.net> References: <515571D8.7030008@gentoo.org> <5155749A.5010302@flameeyes.eu> <51557B1B.9020408@gentoo.org> <51557D48.5010008@flameeyes.eu> <51558704.20904@gentoo.org> <20130331010601.GA965@ca.inter.net> <51578EC0.60004@gentoo.org> <20130331142227.GA937@ca.inter.net> <20130401015653.GB912@ca.inter.net> <20130401153218.GA904@ca.inter.net> From: Markos Chandras Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:06:54 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 78ctPgXs4mVcPSm_zpHz3oHolTY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt : SOLVED To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 929c0a18-c2ea-42a4-9b2c-e3adc1e25222 X-Archives-Hash: 96875f06cb59bbd522923de87992eae6 On 1 April 2013 16:32, Philip Webb wrote: > 130401 Markos Chandras wrote: >> On 1 April 2013 02:56, Philip Webb wrote: >>> I have sent a msg to gentoo-user describing how to solve this problem. >>> Perhaps it needs to be mentioned in the news item or wiki entry. >> So you broke the threading on the original email, >> you deleted all the previous content, >> you did not write an appropriate title for your e-mail >> and then you claim you solved a problem >> without mentioning what the problem was. > > Your response is completely out of place & very impolite. > I am trying to help improve Gentoo documentation > & help other users who may face the same problem, > but without taking unnecessary space on the dev-list. > I am not happy with the way the Udev-200 update has been documented, > but I haven't criticised the developer responsible. > > Please take the trouble to read what I sent to the user-list : > Oh but of course. This was more than obvious. Posting something to gentoo-dev just to inform us that you posted something to gentoo-user without even mentioning the title. And then you claim that my reply is out of place. Ok -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang