From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACAA198005 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DD60E08D1; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A5B8E089E for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fg15so3581864wgb.1 for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 07:30:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=ep2ICK2HFnXlfX+0xriY3+w5+eLZZJBbhJScs7dyLNM=; b=nIRBsom7/HnwJ+anE9VZtnaRpbVDHigbcOtk2k5XL17nWMrtUP8CrkDg6SggatLiQI dVp/snkys3pvi9Utoc2QseqrX5+6krwQcKSAz7Bi3yKXLDeH52eR/I6RFY+J1YOPj8+P J0FyZM6+nHXYvvhG0kLMEwIBqlieRbrWBdvwg5VXrN/OMjZb1NZSJasMsJ+rvFmTIcQU amN9N/Q035RxcWkLWfNfajI6TPqBuJ/DoC0lYt+6nnW21WmKqGPAOXkCjKqvUWmJz22z t2FQ5WXC+07DwZHjP1qj2Luiop7YXXkHOD0bSmYdKGEmdUXO7TxLEtmTwR4pyGkkSvV7 5fKg== X-Received: by 10.180.103.40 with SMTP id ft8mr6961293wib.28.1362324609162; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 07:30:09 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 07:29:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130303123859.11591.qmail@stuge.se> References: <20130301081602.D1F5D2171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201303022045.00196.vapier@gentoo.org> <201303022057.29177.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130303024149.32069.qmail@stuge.se> <20130303120155.8312.qmail@stuge.se> <20130303123859.11591.qmail@stuge.se> From: Markos Chandras Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 15:29:49 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: klp_GIYj7vG3bFY35rec1mKHQAk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/confuse: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 17737ce0-78a4-4400-b48a-85b7f9c80f50 X-Archives-Hash: 8d1658a383e3827ece20dc50ad74911f On 3 March 2013 12:38, Peter Stuge wrote: > Markos Chandras wrote: >> > I explain to you what happened >> >> "getting stuff done" is not an answer. I still don't understand why >> stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike >> did that or just playing smart here? > > To me it's obvious that he did it because it made something easier > for him. By breaking the Gentoo rule he got something done. I asked why he did it, and you keep telling me because he had to. When you are in place to give me a more detailed answer please do so otherwise I am asking you to stop making noise on the list. > > >> Instead of you giving me cryptic and "smart" answers, you could >> have explained to me why it was necessary and job done. > > I have no idea what exactly became easier for him, and what it is may > be none of our business. Maybe it is not your business, but I am reviewing commits from time to time because: a) I often see useful tricks in ebuild writing so it is a good learning procedure and b) because some people may did a bad commit so I would like to be there and point them at it In this case, I would like to know the reasoning behind that commit. I am not the "Gentoo police", just trying to understand the commits that don't make sense to me. It this *that* hard for you to understand it? > > Again, I guess you have to make Mike go away now. > I never said that so please just stop it. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang