From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D531381F3 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3314EE09DE; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26DDAE0986 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 23:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o7so715264wea.22 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:42:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mhTwAtgAD8I+Ubgez6fH9V5nJCa625g7vmgbfL/jSj0=; b=piw4dKf1gY9SzpmRJmzAEJ9zt93kZn+XOj0YStdNoYkPcfo4RVr6PqOKhuE/L2W5VV OA4pi9gNxljRVj43SWYEUvDBGVYE+mKnJbMqZJq5YDCFO+6cSPhdnyELOsGBj4icme07 VeHf77gfuMsrB8FzUEvzzQ2V59/Ho4T7sUbH+dNCuGCdzwvX77BXUIJ02jZv4TUJ7tTv y0MPl5zGQYNekpqv9PtJVZzP3RDmHhLKpaX3O5kH/keYYEo2QCT9h6jo4VUv9rperLE6 8mYj2dFR/f9nRoVGfYeI+VsFn+JzmzGEewOwnpJkbMGJU7alcMinIdpS5V5PyBP9+sdw ICMw== X-Received: by 10.180.13.34 with SMTP id e2mr4777734wic.29.1365896559610; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.121.196 with HTTP; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:41:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130413213036.GA31703@linux1> References: <20130413194314.GA31253@linux1> <20130413232724.07c19b9a@pomiocik.lan> <20130413213036.GA31703@linux1> From: Markos Chandras Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 00:41:59 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _a76UfWT7vMAZbAEc9zposc5DFw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: systemd-next.eclass To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f822fea0-97fa-46cb-aa24-838db38b6637 X-Archives-Hash: c4b3fb5fe8e5a047e72494d8d07a1ea2 On 13 April 2013 22:30, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:43:14 -0500 >> William Hubbs wrote: >> >> > this eclass is an alternative to systemd.eclass, and maintains >> > full compatibility with it; however, it expands it so that it can quer= y >> > pkgconfig for the directory paths. It returns the same default paths a= s >> > systemd.eclass if there is an error with pkgconfig. >> >> Alternative? So now developers decide whether they want support systemd >> A or systemd B? And we fork packages so that users can have matching >> set of packages? >> >> If you listened, you would know that the only reason I didn't apply >> your patches to the eclass was that nothing used them. If you really >> want to commit your quasi-fork, I will update the eclass. You >> don't really have to play silly games like this. > > Ok, that is the better aproach anyway, go ahead and update the eclass. > > Thanks much. :-) > > William > Am I the only one wondering why you didn't discuss this before you submit a new eclass for review? -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang