[gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[Martin Dummer]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I have a question:

Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778 is assigned to
"Dustin Polke" <gentoobugsie.20.dsurawicz@spamgourmet.com>

While the bug is easy to fix and close, no action happens.
So I tried to find out whats the meaning of this strange email address.

After a visit to https://spamgourmet.com/ this mail address means that
only the first 20 emails send to this address are forwarded to the
registered user's real mail address. Any further mails are discarded.

Now my question: is this a good behaviour for a developer?

What's your opinion?



Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlFbPnoACgkQrl/4JlwVxHi9xwCg7/03GDd+1Wjf5Ju0PcTnq3ke
l4cAoPZYLxhMN4ibzig0SACAvtF2WZ/k
=aBHl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[Markos Chandras]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1175 bytes --]

On Apr 2, 2013 9:24 PM, "Martin Dummer" <martin.dummer@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a question:
>
> Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778 is assigned to
> "Dustin Polke" <gentoobugsie.20.dsurawicz@spamgourmet.com>
>
> While the bug is easy to fix and close, no action happens.
> So I tried to find out whats the meaning of this strange email address.
>
> After a visit to https://spamgourmet.com/ this mail address means that
> only the first 20 emails send to this address are forwarded to the
> registered user's real mail address. Any further mails are discarded.
>
> Now my question: is this a good behaviour for a developer?
>
> What's your opinion?
>
>
>
> Martin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlFbPnoACgkQrl/4JlwVxHi9xwCg7/03GDd+1Wjf5Ju0PcTnq3ke
> l4cAoPZYLxhMN4ibzig0SACAvtF2WZ/k
> =aBHl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.
Some bugs take time to be fixed. Please be patient. We are just volunteers
here.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1721 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[Diego Elio Pettenò]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 733 bytes --]

On 02/04/2013 22:37, Markos Chandras wrote:
> The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address. Some bugs take time to be fixed. Please be patient. We are just volunteers here.

I would argue that we should not expect fake email addresses in Bugzilla
for people who are actually in a development position.

If you don't want to receive mail from bugzilla you can disable bugmail,
and even that is a nuisance for the remaining developers and users — and
I say that knowing full well that _my_ account has mailing disabled
right now, but I'm on a sort of leave of absence so I would say it's
intended.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 555 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[Markos Chandras]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 914 bytes --]

On Apr 2, 2013 9:47 PM, "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu> wrote:
>
> On 02/04/2013 22:37, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.
Some bugs take time to be fixed. Please be patient. We are just volunteers
here.
>
> I would argue that we should not expect fake email addresses in Bugzilla
> for people who are actually in a development position.
>
> If you don't want to receive mail from bugzilla you can disable bugmail,
> and even that is a nuisance for the remaining developers and users — and
> I say that knowing full well that _my_ account has mailing disabled
> right now, but I'm on a sort of leave of absence so I would say it's
> intended.
>
> --
> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
> flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
>

Yeah fine by me. I was just explaining what the situation is like.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1208 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[Markos Chandras]

On 2 April 2013 21:49, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Apr 2, 2013 9:47 PM, "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2013 22:37, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> > The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.
>> > Some bugs take time to be fixed. Please be patient. We are just volunteers
>> > here.
>>
>> I would argue that we should not expect fake email addresses in Bugzilla
>> for people who are actually in a development position.
>>
>> If you don't want to receive mail from bugzilla you can disable bugmail,
>> and even that is a nuisance for the remaining developers and users — and
>> I say that knowing full well that _my_ account has mailing disabled
>> right now, but I'm on a sort of leave of absence so I would say it's
>> intended.
>>
>> --
>> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
>> flameeyes@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
>>
>
> Yeah fine by me. I was just explaining what the situation is like.

I asked the maintainer to provide a valid e-mail address

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778#c20

--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[Michał Górny]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1096 bytes --]

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:37:45 +0100
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Apr 2, 2013 9:24 PM, "Martin Dummer" <martin.dummer@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778 is assigned to
> > "Dustin Polke" <gentoobugsie.20.dsurawicz@spamgourmet.com>
> >
> > While the bug is easy to fix and close, no action happens.
> > So I tried to find out whats the meaning of this strange email address.
> >
> > After a visit to https://spamgourmet.com/ this mail address means that
> > only the first 20 emails send to this address are forwarded to the
> > registered user's real mail address. Any further mails are discarded.
> >
> > Now my question: is this a good behaviour for a developer?
> >
> > What's your opinion?
> 
> The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.

In my opinion every developer *should* have a working e-mail address.
Imagine that someone might want to mail him -- it's really impolite to
provide a fake address which will drop all incoming mail silently.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 966 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778)

[Markos Chandras]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1325 bytes --]

On Apr 2, 2013 9:46 PM, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:37:45 +0100
> Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 2, 2013 9:24 PM, "Martin Dummer" <martin.dummer@gmx.net> wrote:
> > > Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453778 is assigned to
> > > "Dustin Polke" <gentoobugsie.20.dsurawicz@spamgourmet.com>
> > >
> > > While the bug is easy to fix and close, no action happens.
> > > So I tried to find out whats the meaning of this strange email
address.
> > >
> > > After a visit to https://spamgourmet.com/ this mail address means that
> > > only the first 20 emails send to this address are forwarded to the
> > > registered user's real mail address. Any further mails are discarded.
> > >
> > > Now my question: is this a good behaviour for a developer?
> > >
> > > What's your opinion?
> >
> > The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address.
>
> In my opinion every developer *should* have a working e-mail address.
> Imagine that someone might want to mail him -- it's really impolite to
> provide a fake address which will drop all incoming mail silently.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Michał Górny

He is just the proxy-maint for autofs. But you could ask him to provide a
real address if you want to.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1982 bytes --]