From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA48138010 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94FBB21C0E5; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:29:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f53.google.com (mail-oa0-f53.google.com [209.85.219.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FC9E0678 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:28:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j6so2398404oag.40 for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:28:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AM6MO/Vwf4AidmDzCEi85Ci36NyNhOBvDFqltReB/1o=; b=R8hMubTJfnyB/clWPROHENbxx+lWs0wGyfTF/pv9CFZP5YHgMn7nldN//8/tkrCILN /muSg3rVWgpbFCrsiT9sZsrLTIic/LHtS5XCuo0QB0KVNOJsM2qtMEI/+PvWbq4frHMW M8Au4ggSrtgq8DBH/jgtwgNcWYBXIuM6LbsKOmorI+KlZv44Q6ltzcaO/VqBNDPjGr2f kI3SZCdzs8Ck0KdIZjJbSPgfIsEVv4WNe7MIxKueEKXNE7PlxfoenN7CnsYmmPlxoEoZ vyXtOd5FCFU3lOZuvmZEvdDg90qlvSf8PPveOOM1uq2IuyikEcLlxMMi/KQ1p15PWz01 rrzw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.38.103 with SMTP id f7mr3085674obk.90.1351772920540; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 05:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.151.8 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:28:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121101103844.48125b28@pomiocik.lan> References: <20121031163225.EE2E121600@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20121031194940.50b2dadb@pomiocik.lan> <509174C8.3090408@flameeyes.eu> <20121101103844.48125b28@pomiocik.lan> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:28:40 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: A0-8hC50SqvXVQiHZaNp6ihWJo4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/boost: boost-1.46.1-r1.ebuild metadata.xml boost-1.49.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.51.0-r1.ebuild ChangeLog boost-1.47.0.ebuild boost-1.35.0-r2.ebuild boost-1.47.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.39.0.ebuild boost-1.50.0-r2.ebuild boost-1.42.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.51.0.ebuild boost-1.37.0-r1.ebuild boost-1.42.0-r2.ebuild boost-1.50.0.ebuild boost-1.48.0-r2.ebuild boost-1.42.0.ebuild boost-1.35.0-r5.ebuild boost-1.41.0-r3.ebuild boost-1.45.0.ebuild From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: flameeyes@flameeyes.eu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8e229040-3f81-4a7b-a6f7-e821156475e7 X-Archives-Hash: ff8c2f6353f11c0792bfbdd0a34a73b5 On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny = wrote: > > And even if that, you have no right to remove maintainers > from a package or unCC them from bugs just because you don't like them > or disagree with their opinion. Especially that you are not > a maintainer of this package. > To be honest, I also don't understand why Diego removed the maintainers from metadata.xml as these people are the real maintainers. cpp@ (as a group) hasn't touched boost for years. --=20 Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2