From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4641E1381F3 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DA6DE0957; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 532FBE094F for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 12:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n11so6360693wgh.21 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:51:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g9BRY14DBA8nZdY2GN8yS6Vq4QJVghp7s7Yf/1mwWXg=; b=STjwxXK7Nv8jNoxgU2EdZRVuXPIdcy0HvoavOERmANSbro8XevbKI3YyK7Bxq/uBkk hM3hLuifG9kC+LF8rA36KMnkasu8iLyt6P0Gar8/pmSr3MNQAgcv2OaqdSOyf1vCi7Ar 7djka5pxRuibKvIR/bNGW7NB96DLbb+6th2PN+ss3/TVLLNKH3rYiWHnbJH6A967AE76 Qdut4aEniqNu6TpLDoAwclBUUWMEGNGtv34mRKVN6bVXHV+xm+QylI6WZxtvFLJ0v3Sq FBIl4a5j2tllRpDrF/ynEnTao6bdMkl8+ltl0KtceTAoPMe4xG3VsOTiJobsqZLjuMAG Kz7w== X-Received: by 10.180.77.197 with SMTP id u5mr2693416wiw.39.1371819069986; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.136.115 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 05:50:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2721009.MOcim2sagC@arcarius> <1371814106.2486.11.camel@localhost> From: Markos Chandras Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:50:29 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qrUqxNqNJYWniAmuQSWA3vfmVKs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: ae99e9a1-1734-4c9a-9b21-0c940724d26c X-Archives-Hash: 4b3775a109af0454a2f4c116b1b30fab On 21 June 2013 12:44, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: > 2013/6/21 Pacho Ramos >> >> Could "maintainer-wanted" assigned bugs be filtered? Otherwise we see a >> ton of that kind of bugs that, I think, we already know can become >> really old ;) >> >> Thanks! >> > You can do such yourself. Just clone the repo [1] and commit the updated > links. > > Also my plan was to list even m-w bugs, because even those suckers get > obsoleted often so we should close them. > > Cheers > > Tom > > [1] http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=3Dproj/qa-scripts.git;a=3Dsu= mmary That is true. There is nothing special about there m-w bugs. They are still unresolved bugs, for many years. No need to treat them differently. -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang