From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3E213839E for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2C8621C0BC; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:39:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED38021C018 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c10so2303654ieb.39 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:39:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EPb51Hz+QwFzTltLT9vMGRIObfvY+IL0gmHpLWgY25o=; b=mCTZ+n5UfZXxzVSuyLh4Wy9AdHiz8UvU8s4FhOen7b3n9VVlETDN5+7OHt1LBRwLx4 HZN/8AH3dMKaZiLnOFbrOVo8y1KhlOGYvGKduTW+l1BEabXABNQqlvLl85i5j8Q+9YQF HRJSA3a3W5dTUBG4h5NwMhpBceg8plQcp2jD0U7PmeuDKfdi7M1VdmDL7hUOMj8zSyIE /9GvtOnT+hhGR1K1EuYYb/KNOwCIU2K/X8xqTv63sEQEPITZrc7IfcjYVemIfzYKNsIs qbhTYyBc6NpqIJW1OVg5jmx8SGeRf7szyAaPR5iVscrCfxrJ9YTQtATSlJA3e1XqtRz9 Xpeg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.219.233 with SMTP id pr9mr2179116igc.19.1357749549257; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:39:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.37.6 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:39:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50ED9802.3060103@carrosses.com> References: <50ED9802.3060103@carrosses.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:39:09 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NdYH2JjD3a-p4PZqcwGW70IMqtg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: c45d8b00-816d-4b86-94bf-a2db1859e50e X-Archives-Hash: b85d75c46317e15ebc377473dd10cc30 On 9 January 2013 18:17, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello everyone :-) > > some devs and I were talking about the fact that TESTED bugzilla > keyword may need a change on his description, or, maybe it's needed to > create new TESTED_${ARCH} keywords. > > Personally, I was using TESTED keyword when an ebuild was tested on > every CC'ed arch, but there are some discrepancy about that, so we > decided to discuss this topic on gentoo-dev@ > > What do you think? What about to create a TESTED_${ARCH} keyword for > every arch? > > Best regards, > - -- > ************************* > Vicente Olivert Riera > peratu@carrosses.com > ID GnuPG: 5AE9E7B2E9BBCBA8 > ************************* > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlDtmAIACgkQWunnsum7y6i1GQCdE60IS5OjVYjBn6y9YFU5QhhC > hKsAn3mPVPclED+CP8db+inhhQmfFaAT > =W+jm > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > The "Keywords" field will end up huge if every CC'd arch uses it's own TESTED_$ARCH keyword. Although only x86 and amd64 have arch testers nowadays. Would it be preferred to have a list of checkboxes for every CC'd arch, and Arch Testers have privileges to select them if a package works for their arch? This would eliminate the "works on $arch" comments that flood the stabilization bugs. -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2