From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-57274-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3E213839E
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:39:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2C8621C0BC;
Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:39:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED38021C018
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:39:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id c10so2303654ieb.39
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:39:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=EPb51Hz+QwFzTltLT9vMGRIObfvY+IL0gmHpLWgY25o=;
b=mCTZ+n5UfZXxzVSuyLh4Wy9AdHiz8UvU8s4FhOen7b3n9VVlETDN5+7OHt1LBRwLx4
HZN/8AH3dMKaZiLnOFbrOVo8y1KhlOGYvGKduTW+l1BEabXABNQqlvLl85i5j8Q+9YQF
HRJSA3a3W5dTUBG4h5NwMhpBceg8plQcp2jD0U7PmeuDKfdi7M1VdmDL7hUOMj8zSyIE
/9GvtOnT+hhGR1K1EuYYb/KNOwCIU2K/X8xqTv63sEQEPITZrc7IfcjYVemIfzYKNsIs
qbhTYyBc6NpqIJW1OVg5jmx8SGeRf7szyAaPR5iVscrCfxrJ9YTQtATSlJA3e1XqtRz9
Xpeg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.219.233 with SMTP id pr9mr2179116igc.19.1357749549257;
Wed, 09 Jan 2013 08:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.37.6 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:39:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50ED9802.3060103@carrosses.com>
References: <50ED9802.3060103@carrosses.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:39:09 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NdYH2JjD3a-p4PZqcwGW70IMqtg
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8iRgQeO+4fq8N3=zE0+tPb6R6R62H6KpYVbeM9tBbNObQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: c45d8b00-816d-4b86-94bf-a2db1859e50e
X-Archives-Hash: b85d75c46317e15ebc377473dd10cc30
On 9 January 2013 18:17, Vicente Olivert Riera <peratu@carrosses.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello everyone :-)
>
> some devs and I were talking about the fact that TESTED bugzilla
> keyword may need a change on his description, or, maybe it's needed to
> create new TESTED_${ARCH} keywords.
>
> Personally, I was using TESTED keyword when an ebuild was tested on
> every CC'ed arch, but there are some discrepancy about that, so we
> decided to discuss this topic on gentoo-dev@
>
> What do you think? What about to create a TESTED_${ARCH} keyword for
> every arch?
>
> Best regards,
> - --
> *************************
> Vicente Olivert Riera
> peratu@carrosses.com
> ID GnuPG: 5AE9E7B2E9BBCBA8
> *************************
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlDtmAIACgkQWunnsum7y6i1GQCdE60IS5OjVYjBn6y9YFU5QhhC
> hKsAn3mPVPclED+CP8db+inhhQmfFaAT
> =W+jm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
The "Keywords" field will end up huge if every CC'd arch uses it's own
TESTED_$ARCH keyword. Although only x86 and amd64 have arch testers
nowadays. Would it be preferred to have a list of checkboxes for every
CC'd arch, and Arch Testers have privileges to select them if a
package works for their arch? This would eliminate the "works on
$arch" comments that flood the stabilization bugs.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2