From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58250-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82451388B3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  6 Feb 2013 13:58:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E91B121C030;
	Wed,  6 Feb 2013 13:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE8B9E0212
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  6 Feb 2013 13:58:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so5045572wie.2
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:58:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=umNuf5GPWk5thPjZalwxbNdkJ+S+FI82POtb4qiEKt8=;
        b=Y+k0J8AGb8Dyt5xF7UzvIXmHsnzpYIuZrEQxRqApkRqblyyUl2ru0q7CX7RGlaxl3d
         SuBoUH1JNElStqqAomJj5QrUAwmwrhh2TPMcKzmrwwP8cD3TizcmbMmdB+yUyt7fjaZr
         pIqFVToBm9yi3iBvohLdeHbZtMeuq92pxqAVTUfBZwk01DxhaUI7YKo8jGpw+rr+JvmK
         7oPSBWc4bhupOWOwMl5Aqnz73k7W6S35eZFbA+3skkTQBXM89UGTTt9n/LDlVusBS67m
         3OpEESh1HwJGOyvgDCgrvkkUhh/xRd79QEodixglO4oKqQSi5l2u+Kz8uH5RVaopx8mj
         UlHw==
X-Received: by 10.194.122.131 with SMTP id ls3mr44033794wjb.55.1360159106517;
 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:58:26 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.104.7 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 05:58:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511260D8.8070606@flameeyes.eu>
References: <CAG2jQ8jRxhMXgpMiLvSv5MngZwVMJwDSjp2W-52UjawO=tk1sg@mail.gmail.com>
 <511260D8.8070606@flameeyes.eu>
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:58:06 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: jbiCUrT72MGcHT3Cd0PIMMWAaaE
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8iAjUEpx6KDJnwgeJQVnog6b6adw3ooC+YLM3Hrp88sAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/run or /run for init scripts?
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 5f248194-7c73-47fa-a525-654c19b6cf72
X-Archives-Hash: fbc55646147b22e6fde81b153416d730

On 6 February 2013 13:55, Diego Elio Petten=F2 <flameeyes@flameeyes.eu> wro=
te:
> On 06/02/2013 14:52, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> I see a lot of inconsistencies in the init scripts. Some of them are
>> using /var/run, others use /run. I just checked my box, and there is
>> no /var/run although some init scripts are trying to use it. Which one
>> is the correct one and why do we have both? The following guide only
>> mentions /var/run
>
> We should be migrating to /run at this point.
>
> http://goo.gl/hrWcN
>
> --
> Diego Elio Petten=F2 =97 Flameeyes
> flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =97 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
>

Thanks. Would it made sense to symlink /var/run -> /run so we don't
end up with stable entries in /var/run directory? Some of my init
scripts appear to reported as "crashed" whereas the process is running
just fine. I suspect this is because a stale entry is in /var/run
directory (or /run I am not sure)

--=20
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang