From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58344-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B693613896C
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:34:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C44021C0B5;
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:34:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0705721C0A9
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:34:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id 15so3998381wgd.28
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:34:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=SUqxTOuQu5RrhHPL+okNSfA4mSIjYVn5XtE0kiUpQPs=;
b=E/2O2nguFSZrP4y+rwM4EH1Ev1w0GUV9U5KI4PzsV4sO/r57zUrDb7fpUxNHzdDlCX
1LoSWjojgHGIKldQ1rdrh1OwhcGmPqF9l/qk/8+dfJBYMUAdCclnemK40OfeU0rWALoz
zCwUMDCf4AMLo1o8InFmq07DS/25gE8Wn/A0qTyVcBBzplXvFaIWaF02jzTzBNujJztF
rzPXHAH3eQiNUHDKFW8Mh4Axws34q3DlZwWH3q4WAS5lp3Dk0P6I25eIya78XrkpQDeK
BS8eNdOMbPl7FA2j4tG2RCgt4OI/fIX2mQLTk1mT/v20BbymfHmTmRYgIwD3DGarU5tU
OoGA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.76.37 with SMTP id h5mr11623494wjw.21.1360503254666;
Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:34:14 -0800 (PST)
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.18.137 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:34:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.18.137 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:34:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzQZfX3JR7Gpgt8bz=8rL8LOEV2d54SLtmxrNg93Mmakiw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201301122147.26044.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
<201302092329.51993.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
<CAFyXEpL2WTAc-_tPyMVQbnz7CZFg8fDaPNKrK=ZZTybs_CT0ZA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAB9SyzQZfX3JR7Gpgt8bz=8rL8LOEV2d54SLtmxrNg93Mmakiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:34:14 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 21w7huKhTeyg0pPq_G2KoYxTBus
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8hc42fhmQ2J41ozTj7v86fiUvMkR_iPeT6JkyKRCvo1NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New, shiny EAPI=5 profiles: volunteer, procedure, preparations
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb03bc435cbe404d55ed938
X-Archives-Salt: 56b9b29b-a65a-4b03-bafb-d074c762d3be
X-Archives-Hash: ab27ae49e21d78a734902c8fd169e689
--047d7bb03bc435cbe404d55ed938
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Feb 10, 2013 8:32 AM, "Ben de Groot" <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed <dwfreed@mtu.edu> wrote:
> >> * all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same
way
> >> as
> >> 10.0 was
> >> * all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
> >> * all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated
> >
> > Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be created for the migration to
the
> > new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from
> > portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people
are
> > going to be confused about this.
> >
> > -Doug
>
> Obviously a news item should precede any deprecation of stable profiles.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> Ben | yngwin
> Gentoo developer
> Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin
>
I think it is too late now. The big red warning is already there.
--047d7bb03bc435cbe404d55ed938
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p><br>
On Feb 10, 2013 8:32 AM, "Ben de Groot" <<a href=3D"mailto:yng=
win@gentoo.org">yngwin@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 10 February 2013 10:43, Douglas Freed <<a href=3D"mailto:dwfreed=
@mtu.edu">dwfreed@mtu.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> * all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable t=
he same way<br>
> >> as<br>
> >> 10.0 was<br>
> >> * all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc<br>
> >> * all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated<br>
> ><br>
> > Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be created for the migrati=
on to the<br>
> > new profiles? =A0As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warnin=
g from<br>
> > portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many =
people are<br>
> > going to be confused about this.<br>
> ><br>
> > -Doug<br>
><br>
> Obviously a news item should precede any deprecation of stable profile=
s.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Cheers,<br>
><br>
> Ben | yngwin<br>
> Gentoo developer<br>
> Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin<br>
></p>
<p>I think it is too late now. The big red warning is already there.</p>
--047d7bb03bc435cbe404d55ed938--