From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F87138010 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB44BE07A6; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E82E076D for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x43so163267wey.0 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:10:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Mr6gvQAtiYxj0lzkmZxSMUtALWFpKyEBW1ZcZeK6bII=; b=d3RxIV3aUn/z1JHJs3p/PhAsPVfhte2SZixYVq+G6OXIjBjpdhIN4BpaqkrhL9/wkN zo3RH3IddHum5T5UT8Ts1OmAPfpS+zdLYwk/ncJdkJTLd2DvEYVJ3D2M13eQM0daYjR0 4yX8jsHgY7VJDJMCUV3MQSShb7qCR8z4ZuhNPz+LKrtZWW/vEIZOQ6liGOF8jJAbCYeM vbl+Hl38LYNUKzOURCaEaubvcefVjG98VNb2o/msYmq02uPRBpW755/9dfiJCM6I8jIq zBIj+VhPUrskptxWh0faTJMkL3PJBUMC6JG61oQ60GLJAyEpwmk9ouNueArgbv9jIP2r VPzg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.71.241 with SMTP id y17mr14035505wju.28.1364159400272; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:10:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <514CE62A.4090605@gentoo.org> <514F1120.7080001@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:10:00 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jdAiXt3YoyOkbPVZKq-MHnkaIuE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime From: Markos Chandras To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcf27478684104d8b21c70 X-Archives-Salt: 90514dda-6468-4e4d-a59f-77677b5f97b2 X-Archives-Hash: 0a2787066bb7360339e559cc41f33bc6 --047d7bfcf27478684104d8b21c70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mar 24, 2013 8:25 PM, "Matt Turner" wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same > > discussion again? > > Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it > could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future > hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy. > Sure but I haven't seen anyone stepping up and fix the existing problems either.... --047d7bfcf27478684104d8b21c70 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1


On Mar 24, 2013 8:25 PM, "Matt Turner" <mattst88@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
> > discussion again?
>
> Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it
> could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future
> hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy.
>

Sure but I haven't seen anyone stepping up and fix the existing problems either....

--047d7bfcf27478684104d8b21c70--