From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58519-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF48138A2D
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:41:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BC85E05F2;
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:41:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f45.google.com (mail-wg0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B119E058F
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:41:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id dq12so2075753wgb.12
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:41:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=a1+uM/Qt3zcqqnV4MsltHgfOZI3Fa3K3LpQpYOJ6zyA=;
b=yg9dgwQAKzW9tp1e0JE0DEQuY4EBU8g+lNssT6IE9+2Y7JIji40cCIlSsNUluJbcyn
+9iM+opgsVKJfEupT8rAh4lif53Kfn1JtQnkz2coayb+BDBI6eHnMe7p6TuQ2yXiQNZ1
arxKLfm76dNShMFbRK/KOqJrqA3+1tnwpQMqEEAmc+7J9F06wOjdNhrT0RTM+R2sCrI5
P4+uuwCoV7QIAAwAfsmfFUtck06GbwpGeNdQtcElFeQCIOMONXWPRXbNjOMBHirmg463
EaGurGfpnFbo0AHOXEVXvkZfSSg2qVppFSUm/hRBMjzidWeuY/t5sianG5zXWPZE7+uj
ETfw==
X-Received: by 10.194.156.170 with SMTP id wf10mr46965230wjb.25.1360860078283;
Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.18.137 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 08:40:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <511D12D3.10101@binarywings.net>
References: <CAB9SyzQTHN1u2vfDcDa3zuYJj8LPwsUhcSp2J-1sFaYWm9DZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
<2790585.uO208i1OU6@drakkar> <CAB9SyzSPMmZ+AE6LdjFtGYOAFFbTs2Y9SCSE3q-LrsrdkWu-Pw@mail.gmail.com>
<2526748.Q5HGkS6H1D@drakkar> <511D0974.2030301@gentoo.org>
<CAG2jQ8iaYPP=rFSrS7v_M+umJem3TvM3C42ThdbC4nO0_xYWJQ@mail.gmail.com> <511D12D3.10101@binarywings.net>
From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:40:58 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: _QpRGjxkjlhW2XYdMFObO-Lx-GY
Message-ID: <CAG2jQ8h99Cq8+khxLgOkaDSk5uukyrvuHDYm1eQpyCMJ70dz1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Graveyard overlay (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites:
games-strategy/x2, games-strategy/x2-demo)
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 33420c0d-e992-47af-ae2a-365462a92532
X-Archives-Hash: b6a2f810d2162e098a4413b1e2cb7541
On 14 February 2013 16:37, Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net> wrote:
> Am 14.02.2013 17:30, schrieb Markos Chandras:
>> On 14 February 2013 15:57, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On 14/02/13 10:33 AM, George Shapovalov wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday 14 February 2013 21:03:55 Ben de Groot wrote:
>>>>>> On 14 February 2013 20:25, George Shapovalov <george@gentoo.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Um, what about the sunset overlay? IIRC, it was used/intended
>>>>>>> primarily for this purpose. Is it still alive? (haven't heard
>>>>>>> it mentioned in a while and layman seems to list onyl sunrise)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You probably mean kde-sunset, which is specifically for
>>>>>> Qt3/KDE3. But I guess we could consider merging kde-sunset with
>>>>>> graveyard.
>>>>> Nope, plain sunset. At the time when the sunrise overlay was making
>>>>> a lot of noise (some 5 years ago?) there was a talk about sunset
>>>>> one. I don't remember details any more and it is absent from
>>>>> layman, so it could have been just talk without anything following
>>>>> it..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>> I remember it too (and I think i mentioned it a couple of weeks ago).
>> I believe the sunset overlay was deprecated in favour of the attic
>> being made more easily available (also probably because no dev's had
>> time to maintain/administer it)
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>> Last time I checked, the sunrise overlay was very much alive. It's
>> purpose is not to store old ebuilds (per se). It keeps high-quality
>> (because they are reviewed by devs and users before they appear in the
>> main branch) ebuilds that are not in portage tree. I think that the
>> sunrise devs would reject ebuilds that got removed from tree for
>> obvious reasons (dead upstream, broken etc etc)
>>
>
> Read again. It's sunset, not sunrise. :-)
>
Oops indeed :-/
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang