From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA101381FB for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1A0E21C07A; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (mail-oa0-f43.google.com [209.85.219.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B6121C02C for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id k1so8444624oag.30 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:19:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m8clCcFL9zsJi9AB9S0VAYpejZmN9B/dk7m4/KBy/Bc=; b=ZoE66ZRhCervWuf4H1lG1p9hcQdgKuwFbyzoxfISIBw9QdfP3sv8ZbVnm90U6fEaqS MFDBGKZ5XHrQpx2JX3EwM/R6v8XFTaUEohbqJYOOEGBXjR1SJwSm2dZCXuqcofUR4Zg3 u62dCSHeYRDu+hHtSrw/NqTR9bBhtLKF4GuGKcLfTWBNhR09cPomZ5WLvyr8SHXGMQhS NbS0uuz8abejvlAuUClXUS+3bIFJpEGlqDOWPgaFjbIAwW1MMQ/u9Sat5lf//dRjzAos xU6F/0iOpr3cfl8weUoWgQa3KUni1fdYOBQxRBCSzx8myn/lzWShjU5zLyX2gfJCGjLK jOsQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.169.205 with SMTP id ag13mr11903740oec.40.1356560392537; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:19:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.28.169 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:19:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1356549921.19423.4.camel@belkin4> References: <1356447696.2353.3.camel@belkin4> <1356547564.19423.3.camel@belkin4> <1356549921.19423.4.camel@belkin4> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 00:19:52 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: UBwEbbgP0fi_YkvdSNJrwjnYJes Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Lastrites: media-sound/logitechmediaserver-bin, net-dialup/misdn, net-dialup/misdnuser, net-misc/asterisk-chan_misdn, www-apache/mod_authn_pam, www-apache/mod_cplusplus, net-dialup/ltmodem, =dev-libs/gmime-2.2.27-r1, www-apache/mod_spin, www-apache/mod_python, dev-dotnet/galago-sharp, sys-apps/galago-daemon, dev-libs/libgalago, www-apache/mod_transform, dev-util/monodevelop-java, dev-util/monodevelop-python, dev-util/monodevelop-vala, media-libs/libdlna, media-video/ushare, app-admin/flexlm, net-misc/cisco-vpnclient-3des, app-emulation/systemsim-cell, sys-block/gcloop, games-roguelike/noegnud-data, games-roguelike/noegnud-nethack, games-roguelike/noegnud-slashem From: Markos Chandras To: Pacho Ramos Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b05ffad1-1374-4e12-bd45-e8124335faee X-Archives-Hash: 9cd2fdbf4532f4a17fc012e3d7c98109 On 26 December 2012 21:25, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mi=E9, 26-12-2012 a las 19:46 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribi=F3: >> El mi=E9, 26-12-2012 a las 17:14 +0000, Markos Chandras escribi=F3: >> > >> > On Dec 25, 2012 8:33 PM, "Pacho Ramos" wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > # Pacho Ramos (25 Dec 2012) >> > > # Fails to build with libav-9 (#443238). Removal in a month. >> > > media-libs/libdlna >> > > media-video/ushare >> > > >> > This is not a valid reason to remove it. I use it every day. Please >> > remove the masking. You should have contacted me first as I think I am >> > on metadata (haven't checked yet) >> > >> > >> >> You were contacted at: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D443238#c1 >> >> But no problem with dropping the mask... the only doubt, should we keep >> libdlna too or drop optional ushare support for it? > > + 26 Dec 2012; Pacho Ramos package.mask: > + Unmask libdlna/ushare as it's still soon to kill libav-9 incompatible > + packages (that is still hardmasked) > + > To be honest, I see no reason for masking packages for removal because they don't build with libav-9. I don't know much about libav-9 but to my understanding it is supposed to provide an API similar to ffmpeg (that's why we have the virtual after all). This means that if the API is now broken, there is nothing wrong with the package, as libav-9 is not API compatible with ffmpeg. I guess the best solution here is to remove the virtual/ffmpeg from dependencies and use just media-video/ffmpeg. Of course, the libav maintainers should know better. --=20 Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2