From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D361388E4 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35020E00B5; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E909E002E for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id d7so2196621wer.36 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:10:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Ni5ldtlmQRgu4E5q5XyyUYUp40OEsJH6cXWqZ6PYtl0=; b=0t5NOLi+iMoRURO+Ua4HjxYAVfpj8Io6SMGEmT1t1i4RjxR2F9kTwkZkP5AW3SeGwg WTAlWMWYJFvfSoqYUBq9/IojohKZtg45aik2RbtbjRgmV0CIQpWrzS+RF17cK7ZxuGFY C8QZ47qxIOvLxl3/3oUrzQeVGWmmczGhxZe3oYd/HvdgBWY6NJ9Cc/YIhIJk7/D8+jl9 O9PA5HDw4dq7+0PEqdqLANEOpha+A7c4j3tgNy6cbWRwttl8VZ1lfJaH2CcHNFr33wHc AvMNt0Dj0ox4hR9ZHCZ+t2UMt0FWhdAenfm5oVCKiUhX0Pi0O0zhaSo9mPhANm+3qAL5 sMrw== X-Received: by 10.180.108.3 with SMTP id hg3mr3804664wib.33.1360253427384; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:10:27 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.104.7 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:10:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20755.53570.200814.993392@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20755.53570.200814.993392@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> From: Markos Chandras Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:10:07 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 05Iwje6_JmhumIQ4k3sZnhFVFvk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files? To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 393abd82-d610-4219-bd9d-3d0e7012e796 X-Archives-Hash: 6e7022e31d1fa5e963f54042f20ed4d2 On 7 February 2013 16:07, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like > CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses, > instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by > our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1], > > So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g., it would > be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order to conform to the > SPDX list), I think that in this case we should get rid of these long > names which unnecessarily clutter the output of various tools. > > The plan would be as follows: > > CC0-1.0-Universal -> CC0-1.0 > CCPL-Attribution-2.0 -> CC-BY-2.0 > CCPL-Attribution-2.5 -> CC-BY-2.5 > CCPL-Attribution-3.0 -> CC-BY-3.0 > CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-2.5 -> CC-BY-ND-2.5 > CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-3.0 -> CC-BY-ND-3.0 > CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.0 -> CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0 > CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.5 -> CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5 > CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.0 -> CC-BY-SA-2.0 > CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 -> CC-BY-SA-2.5 > CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-3.0 -> CC-BY-SA-3.0 > CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-2.5 -> CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5 > CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-3.0 -> CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 > CCPL-Sampling-Plus-1.0 -> CC-Sampling-Plus-1.0 > CCPL-ShareAlike-1.0 -> CC-SA-1.0 > > In total, about 100 packages are affected. so it's a minor effort. > > Ulrich > > [1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/ > Your plan makes sense to me, so +1 -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang