From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A493138010 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F28BE09EE; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4EDE0814 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c11so1564321wgh.32 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:00:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=pVYXcqAnbVwlr3byK8ETlgjILjaAuWik6EdZx+7eiKk=; b=FrMI3r6N0JnbfZDjValLL5iOodaGkcMWfknULbsA5ZxGYvcbm2C2SuuoUZi7hoMoe7 G7zztO/9uVrWjOQnEQVQQ5C3yg31c7EWlGg9p2DB1fmiUgqv3JPEOW3Seo3nkrGfXqe9 +N7hUs7LZIwcEXQUopPx+RoWbNRX+vAfNgQt5ylx8lg6ltPdBl3VOwErubGIzIeWF2Ej umlo9+tbHkbpVJ8e9XpryU0U2dd7iWV/xZgmNlAQoVlGTSgJ+SgF/oE81BVwIu+D05sz UOj0J+ec84xbpTXCWGYR3wddcbPWMlkZauwoZJ926f24w3qXC3pGKU96EGSp/m7bHaTP QhQg== X-Received: by 10.194.120.195 with SMTP id le3mr11615358wjb.46.1364742000498; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 08:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: markos.chandras@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.121.136 with HTTP; Sun, 31 Mar 2013 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <515848E7.6070000@gentoo.org> References: <1364739240.22870.5.camel@belkin4> <515848E7.6070000@gentoo.org> From: Markos Chandras Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:59:19 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vmwz2wssUb2vezKjyrAzsuyVQ9A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About net-p2p herd status To: gentoo-dev Cc: Pacho Ramos , net-p2p@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 20597cdf-48ea-4219-b292-bed74a6e19f6 X-Archives-Hash: 59135850debe87a59e4ac1db7859f502 On 31 March 2013 15:32, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 31/03/13 17:14, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> Looks like this herd has some unattended bug for a long time (some for >> some years), and looks not quite active. Is it still active? Should it >> be dropped in favor of dedicated maintainers for its packages? >> >> Thanks >> > > I've just added myself back to net-p2p@ but haven't had time to work on many > bugs yet > > But no comment, if the herd gets deleted, then it gets deleted, i'm neutral > about that, can't speak for others > > - Samuli > The herd currently maintains 58[1] packages and a number of them are being co-maintained by other people. I don't think the herd is active and my opinion is to move high-profile packages, such as deluge, qbittorrent, rb_littorrent and packages co-maintained by others away from this herd. [1] hwoarang@helix ~ $ portageq --herd=net-p2p -n | wc -l 58 -- Regards, Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang