From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9623D138957 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ACFC21C020; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f50.google.com (mail-vb0-f50.google.com [209.85.212.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BA7E21C015 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id ft2so3110058vbb.37 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:43:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=fp+6IgPaE2tnnKGJRybhJ0dXCl7SdQTkpfDpdnNqgII=; b=PHbX61LpM57CD74YjPKddlELxxs9alH2bUXZpo1XUb37bhuA/fYsR8dQa8GobGtnpW l3mT0+vg3N8u5NTMrmxyLPfpMxtNV5WkECIGvMEnmTu5bn5mrAYvK1Z4sNDr+d6iv4ZC 6vURUell7FZNJGLhEc0AThT1fRp6SWSf7hqn6sXLeAF+/15u91cf0umTOyPoiKDwXQVL SgeuA93cSIiLm8a1ZD7lZbGsbPNudSxOil0veb80qPA+Ub7nwklyrsvvmDlt4AVSQPS0 Z9Pscrm40lyj3tRLmX8P8mGaV5pxqTvIiTIk0lAMXfYM1WjsEjzPF/F7mEWlXOZ/d6yi wwfQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.21.175 with SMTP id w15mr11381686vde.100.1360464200595; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:43:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.216.165 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:43:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.216.165 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:43:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201302092329.51993.dilfridge@gentoo.org> References: <201301122147.26044.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <201302092329.51993.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:43:20 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New, shiny EAPI=5 profiles: volunteer, procedure, preparations From: Douglas Freed To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307c9bba67f85c04d555c1ee X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnNY8jyNBZIoQXCzv0GEgJmUUsmFruSy/gLWifkRU31VWdstwkTPl/XKCiilgRgpgdt9kVB X-Archives-Salt: 0503e66e-3ebc-4e54-8154-e0348155ebe2 X-Archives-Hash: 6098db6221ef503399d041cc5de261ec --20cf307c9bba67f85c04d555c1ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > * all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked stable the same way as > 10.0 was > * all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc > * all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be created for the migration to the new profiles? As a Gentoo user who just got a giant red warning from portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like many people are going to be confused about this. -Doug --20cf307c9bba67f85c04d555c1ee Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> * all 13.0 profiles have been created and are marked st= able the same way as
> 10.0 was
> * all 10.0 profiles have been removed from profiles.desc
> * all 10.0 profiles have been deprecated

Suggestion: perhaps a news item should be created for the mi= gration to the new profiles?=C2=A0 As a Gentoo user who just got a giant re= d warning from portage that his active profile was deprecated, I feel like = many people are going to be confused about this.

-Doug

--20cf307c9bba67f85c04d555c1ee--