From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59076-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4147A198005
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:17:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A10E0E0730;
Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:17:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f177.google.com (mail-vc0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8FC2E0663
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m18so1431233vcm.8
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:17:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=XRSFJT4b2t76cqZPrguxF+8NF7vYadH07R8OyKABZ1w=;
b=Xeya/KIqYpryuPrX0Q1KHSaYtaW+HKP0Nd6bxa3YNBeXqrHQjY86Jsf/XMPYQIaXSM
lZKv8Zqb/IH8WNhH0tdoemPaNVSu3TtqJhzVcaf7fjDZIRVX+TdJsr+MMxAImChknH7I
HiihT0fxlUu4kul+hnIZJh2dzYxrrpdmlODJ0CgADFwMddFiWDw3rHX0F5BQUBqJQadn
acjIhEFUzZ+tkBo89XGb+h+pgh/2TR4rcet1mhkW/p2NmQlnh+lccwq0B60DJPWC3s/E
LNs4CzHzu4Q6bMrrJpkS7XBAJfSsFvS+uhxIu8GKgBpMJb2tVJglYBUWQX4orB5Uwi3t
NK2w==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.153.143 with SMTP id k15mr2632431vcw.13.1362853072806;
Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:17:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.235.66 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:17:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.235.66 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 10:17:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <513B70CA.5040905@gentoo.org>
References: <513B70CA.5040905@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:17:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFyXEpKYPUObOnp7c2qAW=zaU2pVnRwaOMg=9u=C67uiQ0Gftw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-reproducible "useless" epunt_cxx QA warning?
Misguided bugs?
From: Douglas Freed <dwfreed@mtu.edu>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043d677149378404d781f57a
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljID72F6knboWWE061hFhgZVkqX7fQaAgH7FhiddqfEXrFp2O0X2RExamHKbHmoSGDQ1l0
X-Archives-Salt: 3d30a6d9-d078-48ba-ab72-068136a5db2c
X-Archives-Hash: bd72cf70a52210097d10462c83ee16b6
--f46d043d677149378404d781f57a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Mar 9, 2013 12:28 PM, "Samuli Suominen" <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> I have to run off for few hours, like now, but this one user is filing
dozens of these epunt_cxx bugs and nobody seem to be able to reproduce them:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/bjwxzad
>
> Could someone verify they are actually legimate before they get assigned
to maintainers?
> I think I've already misguidedly removed one of these checks from expat's
ebuild.
I've seen these myself in /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log, but they don't
show up as part of Portage's output during a run (as of latest 2.2). I
didn't think much of them, or I probably would have filled a dozen or so
bugs myself (or dug into the root cause, as mgorny has done, and filed one
bug against the right thing).
-Doug
dwfreed
--f46d043d677149378404d781f57a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p dir=3D"ltr"><br>
On Mar 9, 2013 12:28 PM, "Samuli Suominen" <<a href=3D"mailto:=
ssuominen@gentoo.org">ssuominen@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I have to run off for few hours, like now, but this one user is filing=
dozens of these epunt_cxx bugs and nobody seem to be able to reproduce the=
m:<br>
><br>
> <a href=3D"http://tinyurl.com/bjwxzad">http://tinyurl.com/bjwxzad</a><=
br>
><br>
> Could someone verify they are actually legimate before they get assign=
ed to maintainers?<br>
> I think I've already misguidedly removed one of these checks from =
expat's ebuild.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I've seen these myself in /var/log/portage/elog/summary.=
log, but they don't show up as part of Portage's output during a ru=
n (as of latest 2.2).=C2=A0 I didn't think much of them, or I probably =
would have filled a dozen or so bugs myself (or dug into the root cause, as=
mgorny has done, and filed one bug against the right thing).</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">-Doug<br>
dwfreed</p>
--f46d043d677149378404d781f57a--