From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D7213827E for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B598E0AA1; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B7BE0A8C for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n12so5615043wgh.14 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:41:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wdC6Qi2AkCtrzN5k4PfZ0xto1Zea9bb4tbw/1HXzGDE=; b=SfkmduuE93nwyZDgj2CHRLsP2RDH0smQLrmRuGlutO5VTmqxqJGBzVgrmWk1esQx/a 646rfhghOmTWXxBI3yzlMpeOlcyGwp1zuTCP9g2V8eMfRMUDpwu2UMBGRZt8lFFoqY8A cg1vFLmzNRKwHrIkZQeQ5stGBTnnn78Iu3Y0muzFT2RJrzBUMcIiPgaSejWM5JQZxbk2 YCzy2BfuDUXe2KHsP5PkF/4+CcSDEeucPVt1KPNoOPoc3hPaldSNl4krmxCcNB23f5Fc d3FT1d9dMZ4J4UdicUzX1p1+sLt/LrpeULcDXP5lbMHrmsaJFL3/LvHqiiGG8ReCwVk+ UBmQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.37 with SMTP id bt5mr21401051wib.43.1386711692009; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:41:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: jdhore1@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.243.199 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:41:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131210223346.48f484be@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> References: <1386708905.1931.2.camel@belkin5> <20131210223346.48f484be@shanghai.paradoxon.rec> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:41:31 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mGgjrOqGg4Sv8TRm85lg-QzNQuc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? From: Jeff Horelick To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: pacho@gentoo.org, cron-bugs@gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043d6779cee8e204ed34f986 X-Archives-Salt: cd60a252-ffae-4855-a755-165658782e43 X-Archives-Hash: 940d0aeac43d6588acfe8d78bc243162 --f46d043d6779cee8e204ed34f986 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm a nobody, but +1 from me. On 10 December 2013 16:33, Lars Wendler wrote: > Am Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:55:05 +0100 > schrieb Pacho Ramos : > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197625#c14 > > > > This has reminded me that maybe we should switch to cronie from > > vixie-cron as default and recommended cron provider in Handbook. Last > > time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died while cronie forked it > > fixing some bugs :/ > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > +1 from me (as the package maintainer of cronie I cannot vote > differently here :P) > > -- > Lars Wendler > Gentoo package maintainer > --f46d043d6779cee8e204ed34f986 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm a nobody, but +1 from me.


On 10 December 2013 16:33, L= ars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org> wrote:
Am Tue, 10 Dec 2013 21:55:05 +0100
schrieb Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.or= g>:

> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197625#c14
>
> This has reminded me that maybe we should switch to cronie from
> vixie-cron as default and recommended cron provider in Handbook. Last<= br> > time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died while cronie forked it > fixing some bugs :/
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
>

+1 from me (as the package maintainer of cronie I cannot vote differently here :P)

--
Lars Wendler
Gentoo package maintainer

--f46d043d6779cee8e204ed34f986--