* [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? @ 2012-02-01 6:01 Sebastian Pipping 2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Pipping @ 2012-02-01 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Anthoine Bourgeois Hello! Anthoine and I are working on some new ebuilds related to a 3D mouse at the moment. For two of these I wonder what package category makes a good fit. While I would save your time on such a simple thing, I would like to avoid moving around things later, too. I have inspected the related metadata.xml files already. Which categories do you advise for? spacenavd driver daemon (with optional X support) --> sys-apps/spacenavd ? --> app-misc/spacenavd ? --> .. ? libspnav library accessing before-mentioned daemon --> dev-libs/libspnav ? --> media-libs/libspnav ? --> sys-libs/libspnav ? --> .. ? spnavcfg X11/GTK GUI tool for configuration --> x11-misc/spnavcfg seems right Thanks in advance! Best, Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? 2012-02-01 6:01 [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping @ 2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev 2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Rostovtsev @ 2012-02-01 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 07:01 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > spacenavd > driver daemon (with optional X support) > --> sys-apps/spacenavd ? > --> app-misc/spacenavd ? > --> .. ? I would suggest either sys-apps or x11-drivers. > libspnav > library accessing before-mentioned daemon > --> dev-libs/libspnav ? > --> media-libs/libspnav ? > --> sys-libs/libspnav ? > --> .. ? dev-libs seems reasonable. sys-libs definitely feels wrong, libspnav would look out of place in that exclusive company of core system libraries. -Alexandre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? 2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev @ 2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan 2012-02-01 18:26 ` Sebastian Pipping 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: ScytheMan @ 2012-02-01 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev Take a look at g15daemon (useful for some logitech keyboards). There you have: app-misc/g15daemon dev-libs/libg15 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? 2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan @ 2012-02-01 18:26 ` Sebastian Pipping 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Pipping @ 2012-02-01 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-dev On 02/01/2012 09:42 AM, ScytheMan wrote: > Take a look at g15daemon (useful for some logitech keyboards). > > There you have: > > app-misc/g15daemon > dev-libs/libg15 > Great, thanks! Best, Sebastian ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-01 18:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-02-01 6:01 [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into? Sebastian Pipping 2012-02-01 8:16 ` Alexandre Rostovtsev 2012-02-01 8:42 ` ScytheMan 2012-02-01 18:26 ` Sebastian Pipping
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox