From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60756-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADEE1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:36:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 090F7E0869;
	Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:35:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194CEE0839
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 01:35:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h1so2731039oag.33
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=s4sAw38s12rd8NKr4mdOHxTSSefFovqy0V3WqBIIozs=;
        b=Stp6h2k1FdZZauKbQ21FRHjn9h+58tR8HSSGfMPG2HCLdbWFmGRN/HrlRZai6w9YSm
         2sauz88H+9FsX43tgImZ+ZsxL0s7zqf24Yh6IZ2b4LgikoEPafZEK5JkgmFJLQxwrC0f
         xC2fbNYQVDzN9SovFBszHKxZyJxoMqPxGIp6B7ml3qRxeR6dcggkQTDdBSmvQWdWl6sz
         nJ4mzzp7c3iQC3IzcA3Yq99rzvgLK0siNAFITzM+lxIDq8WKvtxgI4we6Jh7S9RVzceW
         FsN+1k8ckw51Cuxwg8Wq1kx+Nzj4sm97/pGM+Hj47vdiNI+PboihcSYhacUyX0rduUnh
         +hdQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.125.72 with SMTP id mo8mr16957071oeb.11.1371087355053;
 Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.65.68 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 09:35:54 +0800
Message-ID: <CAF1ZMEdTEh7Qxr9vsWc5JfkvT5zEGfasVr6P9Zpv4yqwd1Nypw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Introduce global dmalloc USE flag?
From: "Dennis Lan (dlan)" <dennis.yxun@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 90544c15-2355-4425-a8ef-6ec08d14cb67
X-Archives-Hash: ba1fe3a9462633d41b91c18ca09fdb6e

HI ALL:
   Is it ok to introduce USE=dmalloc global flag? description as following
"dmalloc - Enable debugging with the dmalloc library"

current consumers:
 1) net-fs/autofs
 2) net-misc/directvnc
 3) sci-biology/yass

also
 4) app-admin/conserver
 5) net-nds/ypbind
 6) net-fs/samba
 7) net-analyzer/scli
 8) net-analyzer/traceproto
 6) net-misc/siproxd

use dmalloc but controlled under USE=debug

Dennis Lan