From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1DD3138359 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D11EEE0837; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x344.google.com (mail-wm1-x344.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::344]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969F4E0821 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x344.google.com with SMTP id e17so181884wme.0 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:54:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JiCIOZOVF9m6Eoqp+pSIyqcsr4iDmosvQSVP30AYBkc=; b=lACMCtNSzBFMQSO6XrW81YWa8LbJtzOeptNTQbwb+ocUuwlUZ1Btvg11b0TyDzMXix Ip1WXW0imbprRsO67VbymfCvp+JBCE/23vsjJ3jeXtKn+GZR9RD/JKre8uz/BbOeVAy3 Q1CQnfxGUntLnTAMVNXkN5I50SOElnre/EWJ+aaWb9vy78hyfs9drHI2FOYC1Jlo8S1m k9P6aGLE3iQgy1W476y9Ce/t+NfvdDLaBA9OsaT23TbrnRnL/GPFuQvt99YD5ofEi9BL yZixVg0xGv0AXv94pEw2Vvj0bFb/ekZyUcHkxeOiuKGfYtj7K1ByAZdZ0C7DojoWoApl tYEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JiCIOZOVF9m6Eoqp+pSIyqcsr4iDmosvQSVP30AYBkc=; b=X0d2vd94j4u1+fGV3cJXfkcSAVP2eTtTPE9B1KXqBwTvwU3mqk5NZJnvL/lfJopKSg 1YBhoEdJMa6w9Tx+MvxhsbBKQhJoLhbgvVocaGG6rwNOWf76vk4lRqZpUEl/eCAYx34s tIk3ASYU0R3dKiJcuJZjgbWbyc3lttO63YT8izPTeH0DerS1Mfc4VAZ3HfyZlyInO4AT W4tb8cYq5iCle7U9V3Ua4DLlVZa3Q5o/TXlKoyDC1TaD1axbM4bFJWcz+h4resDoFUpJ p0AuWbxIsquYM+hN5j/mRG04WxPC/xhVUOHzo8D2ftXwhmEkLA/3ynA99+u2UbM7cp6i tjQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532V5h5CtoplQea4vK5AFK/vhOFbpbsP/gCiEb9Xof75ngBEq1My rpEwFVJxfyRJjNoE4BnHSiHakLweuq1ryWnUrZfpZDdo X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqxrfVZ5b2jemNVdSGDwAh8DbKVvP4lZ8kYXsuQweEWM+bhRBA6hrAFQP5dD8aeSJYfRk+IQIWyKPw8jkCl7g= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cc0c:: with SMTP id h12mr53452wmb.57.1599594865770; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <874ko8w9ap.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <874ko8w9ap.fsf@gmail.com> From: David Michael Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:54:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] acct-group.eclass: declare the missing dependency on shadow To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 2b48b406-3e38-4a71-bd1d-070dffc934b4 X-Archives-Hash: f412dd7b9379c905f6a187342526e19b Hi, This fix might not be so straightforward. A configuration I tested hit a dependency loop with shadow -> pambase -> systemd -> a bunch of groups -> shadow. It is possible to bootstrap around by emerging shadow with no USE flags first, but I don't know how acceptable it is to introduce new dep loops like this. Thanks. David