From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DA2138334 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 055DDE0844; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8A8E0827 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (mail-io1-f50.google.com [209.85.166.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D07734D2CA for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id x21so13578427ior.2 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:30:54 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSk9jc5KqXo0VTNPpsdHsh7jspKp3jljwWOoo5WoZtPA4GXlMV PR0HLL/KyNn2l1YC3VabaoXNw9dBi89dsK5aRts= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKqMBxGp33YL6R970sP4ZAbAR1Hl19xgbPEDyhCIOWUz0nXsiqzOrcGf8tgtH4N7fvA4H5/Ui4LoQ/W+ESqoM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:91:: with SMTP id v17mr18863302jao.97.1574616651566; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 09:30:51 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191121033234.GE8235@cloudsdale.the-delta.net.eu.org> <45eb8a75607adb832f8fc1765e7d06a04b016023.camel@gentoo.org> <3510669.sfXIqWOT4O@ernie> In-Reply-To: From: Matt Turner Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 12:30:40 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Addressing split usage of USE=gles[123] To: gentoo development Cc: Mart Raudsepp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: ce36cef9-1952-467e-a603-0321c5e85946 X-Archives-Hash: 88a94e750c03515fca4039c115a0d528 On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:09 PM Matt Turner wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:54 PM Dennis Schridde wrote: > > > > On Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 09:11:46 CET Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > > See also this related old thread: > > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/e04f6d321e424a237af62721d1d09 > > > 211 > > > > I think tackling the triad of opengl/gles, egl/glx, X/wayland is also a good > > idea. Generally, all these probably have to distinguish between "support for > > XYZ" and "use only XYZ", the latter hopefully being the exception, so that the > > former can take the shorter use-flag. That's what I don't like about the > > proposal from 2018: Globally enabling USE=gles will have different effects on > > different packages. That's also what I like about the recent proposal: The > > flags are more explicit. > > Totally agree. FWIW, we have bugs filed about this for USE=wayland [0] > and USE=USE={egl,gles{,1,2,3}}. > > I would be happy to see someone take up this project. I'll be happy to help. Is anyone planning to work on this? > [0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/627714 > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/627758