From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNUBJ-0003vp-GH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:16:45 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB098E08AC; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085DEE083B for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6633F1B4027 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so76447pbb.40 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.212.227 with SMTP id nn3mr15841026pbc.122.1335467754479; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.136.73 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:15:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120426170125.GA30041@odin.qasl.de> References: <20120424201246.A791C2004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20120425230408.497a6ca4.dirtyepic@gentoo.org> <20120426180004.65f0f2eb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20120426170125.GA30041@odin.qasl.de> From: Matt Turner Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:15:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/adobe-flash: metadata.xml adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild ChangeLog To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: f6a3fa47-76c7-4c35-a489-1bf03c66107e X-Archives-Hash: a2128203ecbf9373e4ca9d1abe66edcb On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: > I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a USE flag for > SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global.. That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE2 instructions without checking for their presence, which causes bad things on systems without SSE2. The purpose of the 'sse2check' flag was to die if the system doesn't have SSE2 and print a message telling the user to use an older version of flash. The relevant bug is https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410547