* [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore
@ 2021-12-23 21:35 tastytea
2021-12-23 22:46 ` Matt Turner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: tastytea @ 2021-12-23 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1206 bytes --]
Hi! I've noticed that the gnome-keyring use-flag is not accurate
anymore for most packages. The only ebuilds with that flag that depend
on gnome-base/gnome-keyring seem to be[1] sys-auth/pambase and
mate-base/mate-session-manager.
All others depend on app-crypt/libsecret, which depends on
virtual/secret-service.
virtual/secret-service currently depends on gnome-base/gnome-keyring or
app-admin/keepassxc and KSecretService will be added too once upstream
is ready.
That's confusing for users of a secret service provider other than
gnome-keyring, so I propose we find a new use-flag.
x11-plugins/wmudmount already uses “secret” and
mate-extra/mate-power-manager uses “libsecret”.
I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
“secret-service”?
Previously discussed in <https://bugs.gentoo.org/829730>.
Kind regards, tastytea
[1] I did a rather naive search with
`grep -Er 'gnome-keyring\?.*gnome-keyring' \
$(portageq get_repo_path / gentoo)`
--
Get my PGP key with `gpg --locate-keys tastytea@tastytea.de` or at
<https://tastytea.de/tastytea.asc>.
[-- Attachment #2: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore
2021-12-23 21:35 [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore tastytea
@ 2021-12-23 22:46 ` Matt Turner
2021-12-24 8:48 ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Matt Turner @ 2021-12-23 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo development
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 4:36 PM tastytea <gentoo@tastytea.de> wrote:
> I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
> an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
> “secret-service”?
I think this is a good idea.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore
2021-12-23 22:46 ` Matt Turner
@ 2021-12-24 8:48 ` Pacho Ramos
2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2021-12-24 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 483 bytes --]
El jue, 23-12-2021 a las 17:46 -0500, Matt Turner escribió:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 4:36 PM tastytea <gentoo@tastytea.de> wrote:
> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
> > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
> > “secret-service”?
>
> I think this is a good idea.
>
And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
understand what "secret*" means in this context
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore
2021-12-24 8:48 ` Pacho Ramos
2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
@ 2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
2021-12-26 10:10 ` John Johnson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szuba @ 2021-12-25 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
>> > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
>> > “secret-service”?
>>
>> I think this is a good idea.
>>
>
>And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
>understand what "secret*" means in this context
Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is also in use on other OSes.
--
Marecki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore
2021-12-24 8:48 ` Pacho Ramos
@ 2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marek Szuba @ 2021-12-25 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in case
>> > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
>> > “secret-service”?
>>
>> I think this is a good idea.
>>
>
>And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
>understand what "secret*" means in this context
Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is also in use on other OSes.
--
Marecki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore
2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
@ 2021-12-26 10:10 ` John Johnson
2023-05-14 15:21 ` Andreas Sturmlechner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: John Johnson @ 2021-12-26 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 718 bytes --]
"keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho.
On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 5:19 AM Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> >> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in
> case
> >> > an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
> >> > “secret-service”?
> >>
> >> I think this is a good idea.
> >>
> >
> >And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
> >understand what "secret*" means in this context
>
> Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is
> also in use on other OSes.
>
> --
> Marecki
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1194 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore
2021-12-26 10:10 ` John Johnson
@ 2023-05-14 15:21 ` Andreas Sturmlechner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Sturmlechner @ 2023-05-14 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 955 bytes --]
On Sonntag, 26. Dezember 2021 11:10:45 CEST John Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 5:19 AM Marek Szuba <marecki@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in
> > >> > case an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about
> > >> > “secret-service”?
> > >>
> > >> I think this is a good idea.
> > >
> > >And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will
> > >understand what "secret*" means in this context
> >
> > Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is
> > also in use on other OSes.
> >
> > --
> > Marecki
>
> "keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho.
>
It seems that keyring won the popular vote. There is now a bug and a PR:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/905928
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31035
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 789 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-14 15:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-23 21:35 [gentoo-dev] USE-flag gnome-keyring isn't accurate anymore tastytea
2021-12-23 22:46 ` Matt Turner
2021-12-24 8:48 ` Pacho Ramos
2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
2021-12-25 11:18 ` Marek Szuba
2021-12-26 10:10 ` John Johnson
2023-05-14 15:21 ` Andreas Sturmlechner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox