From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3172913826A for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 00:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E156234004; Thu, 26 May 2016 00:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A1B21C01D for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 00:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com (mail-qg0-f43.google.com [209.85.192.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC80E340961 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 00:12:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id q32so30704344qgq.3 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:12:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKDw5a/dH3pqufigYsjZZLtGWAMR+QrSsDBmEWGv56cAEeOc7NTMP609vaxX5K4/6HTkP8LRHCH1v707w== X-Received: by 10.13.193.71 with SMTP id c68mr4085267ywd.58.1464221564871; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.214.147 with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2016 17:12:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Turner Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 17:12:25 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-dev] app-portage/tatt: completely broken? To: gentoo development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 8047b75a-0958-4733-8063-9b9bca520e8f X-Archives-Hash: 791c0bf5027a8b412e6795e770ada7d2 Is tatt usable for anyone? Both the 0.3 and 9999 versions seem to hang after printing the Bugnumber: # tatt -b 576112 Bugnumber: 576112 CTRL+C gives this traceback: ^CTraceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python-exec/python3.4/tatt", line 135, in bugraw = p1.communicate()[0].decode('utf-8') File "/usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py", line 947, in communicate stdout = _eintr_retry_call(self.stdout.read) File "/usr/lib/python3.4/subprocess.py", line 491, in _eintr_retry_call return func(*args) KeyboardInterrupt I've asked multiple times in #gentoo-dev, but the lack of responses indicates to me that no one actually uses it which would be a shame. If it is indeed broken, perhaps we should remove mentions of it from pages such as [1]. Does anyone successfully use tatt? Are there alternatives to scripting this boring keywording procedure? [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Arch_testing_guide#tatt