From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51857-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SXEwX-0003Dx-Ff
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:01:49 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D1D6E0899;
	Wed, 23 May 2012 17:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F31E0853
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 649D51B4014
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dadg9 with SMTP id g9so12315223dad.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.227.197 with SMTP id sc5mr12174261pbc.58.1337792416316;
 Wed, 23 May 2012 10:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.43.102 with HTTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 09:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20120523T164346-726762549Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> <robbat2-20120523T164346-726762549Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 12:59:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38HkMgFhAkpx09Y75ojJYjWAJaLHu4jtkftqrTLE9Ow2sA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 75d44eeb-4436-47ee-9895-edfa6afe26c3
X-Archives-Hash: 26a2410104fb386a043a9e527c902f6c

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 2. Arches were Git repos are too heavy (Kumba wanted this for MIPS)

Please don't go to this trouble for the ability to commit to portage
on *really* slow systems.