From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59794-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F311381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A08EE0863;
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63134E083D
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 800DB33DD28
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k19so484257qcs.41
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=aFiCsR7UV6SK12tAzNm3AGa7nK4MiaDrPBgw+40lAk8=;
b=od1/I+LLEj2I/Eaat0LG3cR80XDHYugZxcTqpHTM8/wSka5d0ojQMYj4GLdzpIjKEh
lsVBauEZF5WcfWeosfvGEpz4nF6MOEKHlciIb1I4K0F+DO9TmmoiNNSimBxfnDhWESim
GBQ8GI0KMKm5lsi/uqYd7I2ThCMJsKxHhKTHjqye3XAcWR3ankNZJxQu1BcUq3U/zCcT
ImCPC/8SYG8iqc0QJrhgKK/ql34rbrh6372NPpXyCHVdvNC6oicjjwQyElO8/Ql+2ZIH
GTuNW7oJLQoaYYqMalnDY210DmDhTbb0JNe3lOA1GFZqclFNcTE8ejweiYMDcAEk1/RN
WGaQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.25.134 with SMTP id z6mr3587336qab.55.1366742308014;
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.28.41 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
<20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable> <CAB9SyzRq-RuMUU0cXnWYC_+-yv3FSJ=fDw335QmUrqQinsbzQw@mail.gmail.com>
<20130421170549.41cfea49@portable> <CAB9SyzQ7f6145adfAcZgMVhdKWBjCHPsVSV-nTOCQbx7rt1PSA@mail.gmail.com>
<20130422154033.65a68a40@portable> <pan$1e4f5$800158e2$35c423dd$7f617b73@cox.net>
<20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38HYCVOSpfSuNO-6pCpvW=oS0w=1iB2WoSt6pa83T3Vzwg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86
commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 1f0f0c6f-4280-4ec4-a22d-175ce4d06f21
X-Archives-Hash: 317d234f8cd71bd289caa08485424d09
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
> Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
>
>> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted:
>> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs
>> > commit twice with cvs.
>>
>> But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already
>> pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything
>> but.
>
> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with
> the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
I didn't interpret it that way. cvs commits are just kind of
expensive, even without repoman doing checks.