From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F311381F3 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A08EE0863; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63134E083D for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 800DB33DD28 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k19so484257qcs.41 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=aFiCsR7UV6SK12tAzNm3AGa7nK4MiaDrPBgw+40lAk8=; b=od1/I+LLEj2I/Eaat0LG3cR80XDHYugZxcTqpHTM8/wSka5d0ojQMYj4GLdzpIjKEh lsVBauEZF5WcfWeosfvGEpz4nF6MOEKHlciIb1I4K0F+DO9TmmoiNNSimBxfnDhWESim GBQ8GI0KMKm5lsi/uqYd7I2ThCMJsKxHhKTHjqye3XAcWR3ankNZJxQu1BcUq3U/zCcT ImCPC/8SYG8iqc0QJrhgKK/ql34rbrh6372NPpXyCHVdvNC6oicjjwQyElO8/Ql+2ZIH GTuNW7oJLQoaYYqMalnDY210DmDhTbb0JNe3lOA1GFZqclFNcTE8ejweiYMDcAEk1/RN WGaQ== X-Received: by 10.224.25.134 with SMTP id z6mr3587336qab.55.1366742308014; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.28.41 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable> <20130421170549.41cfea49@portable> <20130422154033.65a68a40@portable> <20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> From: Matt Turner Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:38:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 1f0f0c6f-4280-4ec4-a22d-175ce4d06f21 X-Archives-Hash: 317d234f8cd71bd289caa08485424d09 On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > >> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted: >> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs >> > commit twice with cvs. >> >> But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already >> pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything >> but. > > Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with > the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone. I didn't interpret it that way. cvs commits are just kind of expensive, even without repoman doing checks.