From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-55893-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208281381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:26:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1374821C063;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:26:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E405C21C05F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:26:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CD7733D86C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:26:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id jt11so2716135pbb.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.203.198 with SMTP id ks6mr23773515pbc.35.1353223569642;
 Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.134.38 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:25:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20121118070539.GA17010@waltdnes.org>
References: <20121106212816.GE82762@gentoo.org> <20121117190207.GY83592@gentoo.org>
 <20121118032922.GA2335@kroah.com> <20121118070539.GA17010@waltdnes.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:25:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38HSZReJ=va0CeQdb76F5h8biuFYJDVKxsq1oNg75u8LAg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13
 November 2012)
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 90bdc2e9-1e2a-4c11-9eea-782d1b38fe7f
X-Archives-Hash: 5836d67c2a61d002f6a6c4d060522657

On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
>> As I posted elsewhere, working on a project based on "hate" only lasts
>> so long.  I should know, that's the reason I started udev in the first
>> place over 9 years ago.
>
>   The Xfree86 people generated a lot of hate, just like Sievers and
> Poettering.  Xorg hasn't burned out yet.

Let's be fair. The Xorg fork was done by a lot of really competent
professional developers who had been developing XFree86 for a long
time.