From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F175E1396D0 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 01:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B9F51FC08D; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 01:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E247F1FC00B for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 01:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com (mail-it0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7708633BF43 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 01:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c195so3408811itb.1 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:26:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhMEDVCgpJeq5Dv5jHLTcGL1a2M7iqUY/Tavq3W8gi8bahLVVUt vIwBj3/IxzCEe+c5KGKI9PWgekxascofq+mjBCo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCSXAs4wEovvOe8WPGGgLlQ/Me5NfPZ3tSGTmbUH+vbt1aYGJINBkAJBIblwv9BvlENb/tnw+lF1D2Xt65y+ck= X-Received: by 10.36.181.22 with SMTP id v22mr2428583ite.118.1505265999690; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.176.147 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:26:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4481473.IXDqc1jNCF@localhost.localdomain> References: <20170911084313.2cf9f40e@sf> <4481473.IXDqc1jNCF@localhost.localdomain> From: Matt Turner Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:26:19 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs To: gentoo development Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 94cd921b-acdb-4a39-b789-a67c9664dfba X-Archives-Hash: 652b1774fea56df4e0643552c74efb6c On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: > On Monday, September 11, 2017 3:43:13 AM EDT Sergei Trofimovich wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 +0000 >> >> bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org wrote: >> > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person >> > whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit: >> > >> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621130 >> > >> > Aaron Bauman changed: >> > What |Removed |Added >> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > --> >> > CC|sparc@gentoo.org | >> > >> > --- Comment #16 from Aaron Bauman --- >> > sparc was dropped to exp. >> > >> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b5901d8f716555a1479f1 >> > 2313a2925fcadd177a9 >> [ CCed gentoo-dev@ to raise general awareness ] >> >> Why do you need to drop sparc@ from CC on all the bugs? >> >> It takes away possibility from users using sparc@ to report >> test status easily. Even after the bug is closed. >> >> sh@ and s390@ are also exp profiles and CC is one of mechanisms >> to ask arch teams to try keywording/stablereq. > > You're right. Fixed. Aaron's agreement was not an agreement at all. He ignored the request and instead removed the other exp arches from Cc. Before I realized this, I assumed that he was agreeing, so I readded sparc@ to the places he'd removed it. This evidently irritated him and he told me so on IRC. I suggested that when security bugs are complete, that if there are exp architectures still Cc'd, that security simply reassign to the maintainer and let the bug continue as a regular stabilization bug. Unfortunately Aaron says that this is far too much work -- the hassle of reassigning a bug and all.