From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7E1138247 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A0A3E09FF; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E04E080A for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 508F533F22B for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id er20so3045263lab.22 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:37:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ckL6f7cVTzPEq0iraX79LQBTx0pta1wMXy7ueZud0EI=; b=JibxtgIcZCRI6mTtXhd3MkusJx8nTj68RvSmpzfWy+0L6dTCb0W/X8S42EEePVCC54 FvT3O8S3apLdgbSd2Mk0fwApKPaXUjyMM+X19f7LwqUeY3hnJz7aRUY3MSBBW6jveKSm 8D8INqlnOemRHTMDmtLFlPpwBSQJrRhhPvLEA0DG51eYsgC1KjXnJccrPUworkB6nF1b DJQsiEYZe00TfCa3s4n/o+R2yQnhFEekj+KIvR1rRMEBXHlbC5sbchVhTasvUZVfG7Yd R7o21WT9vEDcf5BAsU84tzS/5sh+WZM6lHSCyQUMuhrgDNhv5ymaGiOZsCfC8DtIiMwZ LBzQ== X-Received: by 10.112.135.103 with SMTP id pr7mr636281lbb.65.1384544232795; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:37:12 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.61.130 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:36:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131115202451.20307e3d@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> References: <20131115202451.20307e3d@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> From: Matt Turner Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:36:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please consider removing use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.mask To: Tom Wijsman Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: a0f398bd-46d5-4689-95e0-0b6facb059a0 X-Archives-Hash: 669b47758a4697846619009078869737 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 20:56:32 -0800 > Matt Turner wrote: > >> Attempting to merge =x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1 >> results in: >> >> x11-proto/kbproto:0 >> >> (x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) >> pulled in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in >> this slot) >> >> (x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >> x11-proto/kbproto[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?] >> required by (x11-libs/libX11-1.6.2::gentoo, installed) >> x11-proto/kbproto[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?] >> required by (x11-libs/libXt-1.1.4::gentoo, installed) > > No, it doesn't, it gives you a lot more output than that; you appear to > be distracted by something that doesn't appear to be a problem at all. What? Where do you get off telling me that the output I copied and pasted into this email is wrong? dynamic71 mattst88 # grep kbproto /etc/portage/package.keywords/xorg =x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1 dynamic71 mattst88 # emerge '=x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1' -vp These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1 ABI_X86="32 (64) (-x32)" 0 kB Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB dynamic71 mattst88 # sed -i -e 's|=x11-proto/kbproto|#=x11-proto/kbproto|' /etc/portage/package.keywords/xorg dynamic71 mattst88 # grep kbproto /etc/portage/package.keywords/xorg #=x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1 dynamic71 mattst88 # emerge '=x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1' -vp These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1 ABI_X86="(64) (-32*) (-x32)" 0 kB Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: x11-proto/kbproto:0 (x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot) (x11-proto/kbproto-1.0.6-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by x11-proto/kbproto[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?] required by (x11-libs/libX11-1.6.2::gentoo, installed) x11-proto/kbproto[abi_x86_32(-)?,abi_x86_64(-)?,abi_x86_x32(-)?,abi_mips_n32(-)?,abi_mips_n64(-)?,abi_mips_o32(-)?] required by (x11-libs/libXt-1.1.4::gentoo, installed) !!! Enabling --newuse and --update might solve this conflict. !!! If not, it might help emerge to give a more specific suggestion.