From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59793-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2519F1381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B6A1E091A;
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:37:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEA4E08ED
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:37:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11DCC33DE0C
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:37:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id bs12so257235qab.1
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:content-type;
bh=ekxWl9bqXfTPkXN+Fak+3vU4/9t1rwVN7IeDNBJ2GDs=;
b=cYhuKtqYHNdCvhIKZqkEeAA0Hx71MOa3RxLPAoWV9+MUpTPLzgAWe9JjDfbAlARvHM
elffukWi/c5j0tFW5wgzXKj+ZG/jiR+ADt/Iyu6Siz4KiB130cRlCOfnaxfeocheZOld
yjbIdsVFgXucbG6RUbBxJBi+UhcNy3p/Kl0oWGOCQyIdXHtHbm5FWzBtKnRgr5okAuA4
ZdS7Aw+6ZvdbAcJB9/w2vBsihQyHc8v9/CKNN4FNSMJX8YbBq1LTVNTJmW0Wflh5B9jt
aFu41OberlW0MJ8z3w0sFnF4J7FHWL3hDex1olMPx2wuxSoL0Sm2PtGSgg6aC1QMAUTU
eB7g==
X-Received: by 10.224.8.129 with SMTP id h1mr26933649qah.86.1366742247637;
Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.28.41 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mXhnpCKA_2+Ck7zXHUG8WG_Jcw2=ivHfqsV0km7nnXXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
<20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable> <CAB9SyzRq-RuMUU0cXnWYC_+-yv3FSJ=fDw335QmUrqQinsbzQw@mail.gmail.com>
<20130421170549.41cfea49@portable> <CAB9SyzQ7f6145adfAcZgMVhdKWBjCHPsVSV-nTOCQbx7rt1PSA@mail.gmail.com>
<20130422154033.65a68a40@portable> <pan$1e4f5$800158e2$35c423dd$7f617b73@cox.net>
<20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <CAGfcS_mXhnpCKA_2+Ck7zXHUG8WG_Jcw2=ivHfqsV0km7nnXXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 11:37:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38HAQZwohAX8-aDRi+AgtBA__DNtrCH3YBDKLZSWaN3amg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86
commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: bbe74942-73b9-484f-84be-3cf3599cb0d4
X-Archives-Hash: 5b652b1587cdeeda6ac8bba07dc3c7ad
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with
>> the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
>>
>
> Interesting point. One thing to keep in mind with git is that commits
> don't affect the "central repository." Pushes are what impacts the
> repository.
>
> If I spend six months working on a bunch of coordinated package
> changes, nobody will see a thing until I push those commits and 500
> ebuilds all change atomically (not that I'm suggesting that lack of
> communication is to be encouraged). A repoman check on a commit may
> not reflect its impact six months later when it actually hits the main
> tree.
... if you're squashing 6 months of work into a single commit before pushing.
I don't think we want to do that, do we? Maybe bisecting isn't
particularly interesting for the portage tree.