From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59779-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABA61381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:06:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C04E0E0ABF;
	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:06:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75FCE0ABB
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com (mail-qc0-f173.google.com [209.85.216.173])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2DD833DA23
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:06:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id b12so3383520qca.32
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=ldAmJ0yBig29cG1yMkXoryM8+0sJAzk6SZcF00FSZj0=;
        b=XginjaDLymNJAFsfSOi/b6F+3F7zvW+Etb7FLndj2tPonaKsqECmwlZDA4S8oUbNBW
         IX0K+wvULODVfS+nv5Avd6WAbkLFKP/QT3YGpZmMdcE9aHtQgOnL1+r7S8V3gXxgS05g
         olTz7esF4pU+KkcOeD1KaA/p75Uy58b2OkmoQOqUkmAvFRhD+jPc1sl/VXH7c4eZLSym
         PbkpPkFAtyu3MB2MqsU1r/eh0rVnvASziRpAk4Ny2N02ne9XUWdHq+RL/oBdIOIPEI/B
         wDY2IAiFdSRVXrAeC78ReaeQ4rF7V6neyH1tuTqq9zRfxA6naQgSzelAChFV+ka9NB0Y
         8V6w==
X-Received: by 10.229.135.210 with SMTP id o18mr5486907qct.42.1366653997382;
 Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.28.41 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzRC5C-0czG+BfsTOgbUT2wxbzQSwVMYow5Fzn_SvF5d9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130421214304.7b08fa57@pomiocik.lan> <CAB9SyzQwVCOyOdYs7q82ZcguKwwJrEW4ja_bZ1svUF9eEp5iuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEdQ38EtL5japN1jw3fbaNTMtY4mzaAOZPFo8MgVGE+4UnDemQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAB9SyzRC5C-0czG+BfsTOgbUT2wxbzQSwVMYow5Fzn_SvF5d9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:06:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38H8yQ1g3zs5Qhr=s6f_Ma-aphzgGLkiqp4-VTjbbQ-uhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in gx86
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: multilib@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: f2c73abb-c7c8-4916-977e-17c788d5f957
X-Archives-Hash: ae4aa49726ca975f523b2ae0668b6f99

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 23:38, Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>> Do I assume correctly that this is a response to the freetype and
>> fontconfig multilib bugs?
>
>
> This thread is not directly about that, but it is related.
>
> I'm not convinced that this multilib solution is mature enough to be
> pushed so speedily into the tree. But maybe I'm the only one...

Many an email has been exchanged about the merits of this approach,
with a consensus reached and the work already done.

I think using your position as maintainer of these packages isn't a
good way to express your concerns.