From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RDhQd-0005QS-S0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:51:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3147D21C154; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD4821C0DC for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8408F1B400B for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19so10033482vws.40 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.69.9 with SMTP id a9mr20856403vdu.17.1318359050113; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.184.38 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:50:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E948C2E.2000706@gentoo.org> References: <20111011164918.2103A2004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <4E9475E1.30708@gentoo.org> <20111011170555.GV704@gentoo.org> <4E948484.1000509@gentoo.org> <20111011181358.GW704@gentoo.org> <4E948C2E.2000706@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:50:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b587a12ade8fdab7dfd0aee38c50ac68 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I just hope nobody will take an example of the ebuild with code > duplication (multiple epatch calls), overquoting, redudant use of find > when rm is more than enough, ... I haven't looked, but if we don't already, a little style guide would be very cool. I wouldn't think of most of these things without seeing it somewhere else first. It looks like the epatch devmanual page uses multiple calls. :\ Matt