From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-98431-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4A7158020
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Nov 2022 02:51:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC917E099B;
	Mon,  7 Nov 2022 02:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70FB9E0997
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  7 Nov 2022 02:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pj1-f46.google.com with SMTP id h14so9302948pjv.4
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 06 Nov 2022 18:51:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnep4feKs0PWdqGi+I5TYmevf9yZ3c0CqFwKLZeGs7tFXuISNOT
	TRyilWMgY6lirNk+TdM9RJefGKwmGojxsksaMxQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf77jZzqaQBjHGkoxok1DLcUmaFaalE8/y4U+F4cIGTZZsPw2M5PL7AlZeXmaEYkR3jZDpILCR3M5uqrVaupV2Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:788f:b0:188:641b:5372 with SMTP id
 q15-20020a170902788f00b00188641b5372mr16517049pll.159.1667789491985; Sun, 06
 Nov 2022 18:51:31 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2022 21:51:20 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAEdQ38GWMyQy99OYGC4Uv96OkG7TSgAdrVa65ZDMpLagEdOV8A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38GWMyQy99OYGC4Uv96OkG7TSgAdrVa65ZDMpLagEdOV8A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Looking for dedicated ModemManager maintainer
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 23e3a9c2-036d-4636-9243-19491f5b71d1
X-Archives-Hash: 61919a19aeebdf4d868e542ac09b4fc1

The following packages are currently maintained by GNOME for no real
reason other than they're a dependency of networkmanager:

net-misc/modemmanager
net-libs/libmbim
net-libs/libqmi
net-libs/libqrtr-glib

But I don't have any ability to test them. I'd really appreciate a
dedicated maintainer take them over=E2=80=94someone who can actually test t=
he
packages.

The packages appear to be in good shape. Recently-released versions
have switched to meson, and I've made a PR here [0] for libmbim and
libqmi.

(In the same vein I wouldn't mind someone taking over NetworkManager...)

Someone lighten my load, please?

[0] https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/28163