From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SOtXr-0001Rx-1m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:33:51 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6043BE0B6D; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F9FE0AB7 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1505D1B4028 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so4764978pbb.40 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.226.198 with SMTP id ru6mr9879239pbc.122.1335803576120; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.65.233 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:32:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201204301211.05705.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <4F9E47AF.9080201@gentoo.org> <201204301211.05705.vapier@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:32:35 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 7e7822e2-ec45-4523-9788-1b7276ab1a8c X-Archives-Hash: ed2652fb5c62aab7b8eb48a566006207 On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote: >> doing it wrong. =A0I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark, >> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source >> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative. > > err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system > includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you so > choose. =A0i think this is a perfectly fine compromise. > -mike It looks like chromium-20.0.1115.1.ebuild removes 45 bundled libraries, and still has TODOs in place to use the system's ffmpeg, hunspell, (Open?)SSL, SQLite, and libvpx.