From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51335-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1SOtXr-0001Rx-1m
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:33:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6043BE0B6D;
Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:33:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F9FE0AB7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1505D1B4028
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:32:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so4764978pbb.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.226.198 with SMTP id ru6mr9879239pbc.122.1335803576120;
Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.65.233 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201204301211.05705.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <4F9E44D0.70002@linx.net> <4F9E47AF.9080201@gentoo.org>
<CAGfcS_nUcubch_2fk9OapdArc1E2B1xgJWNDY45OrwKd2QRwHw@mail.gmail.com> <201204301211.05705.vapier@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:32:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38GMaGVqCw3ncQaHE1osQs-jeVL1CaOFqb+o-Ungd2jo=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Chromium bundled code
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 7e7822e2-ec45-4523-9788-1b7276ab1a8c
X-Archives-Hash: ed2652fb5c62aab7b8eb48a566006207
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> doing it wrong. =A0I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark,
>> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source
>> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative.
>
> err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system
> includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you so
> choose. =A0i think this is a perfectly fine compromise.
> -mike
It looks like chromium-20.0.1115.1.ebuild removes 45 bundled
libraries, and still has TODOs in place to use the system's ffmpeg,
hunspell, (Open?)SSL, SQLite, and libvpx.