From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9977D138334 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24436E098F; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F812E08A6 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACF7E34B4EB for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id q10so978429iop.2 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:43:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpFLjv7Fj/Mh2DARK8oCUlhr3jfIdNNzRoB7LhZa0VOa3Pe0Yx JzKu7nw3SbudXlHt7xPCy3jsWdg1AbYjtf80kaI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxu/Q3lQ+ZFC/euU8VZpRugboc+IxrS6r77F/GbQOHUontwu5dpWVTFgv8WWt35ZB4as8beUe6JyEuFAuURP8A= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d817:: with SMTP id l23mr1132058iok.142.1569296616761; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:43:36 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190924014220.GA45747@baraddur.perfinion.com> In-Reply-To: <20190924014220.GA45747@baraddur.perfinion.com> From: Matt Turner Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:43:24 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Adding 'GPL-2-only', 'GPL-3-only' etc. license variants for better auditing To: gentoo development Cc: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= , licenses Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 1e4d2fe9-5a82-49bd-a88f-73fd15b2b591 X-Archives-Hash: 873b15f67d1d2470d26b416b59ddeb15 On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 6:42 PM Jason Zaman wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having > > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's > > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. > > > > This has been discussed before. There is no such license as GPL-2-only. > > Yes there is: > https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html > https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-or-later.html Just so everything is clear: Ulrich is just making an extremely pedantic point that the there's no version of the GPL-2 license itself with the "only" in it. Strange, now that I think about it I don't remember a "GPL-2+" license either...