From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-100092-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E38A215800A
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:50:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38857E086F;
	Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:50:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F81E084E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 13:50:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-f174.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-cab61f812efso4593820276.1
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 06:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLahjnTNfOLyjBxOjrVwLmBN9R5NQ4P2/oIUNBo7bi49D37kttvx
	ngbhI0TVMYHFe62CcLCHTXv2Cz5NIiI/81e5aTs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEju+QozTabBxBXRrjlc63S6K+cvQYuNVAqRtBhekxuZDCjC8raEfVSf9djfrUb5vWOjVOTknjLtjsYUkW72oA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:fc04:0:b0:c01:f192:6f5a with SMTP id
 v4-20020a25fc04000000b00c01f1926f5amr10361241ybd.40.1689601833381; Mon, 17
 Jul 2023 06:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEdQ38HFJStXhFqhQqcz8sCWBZoT1WuJPojtDNAWu8XNQejNLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <19edc9b0-6f85-cd19-48ed-d2b7152d256a@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <19edc9b0-6f85-cd19-48ed-d2b7152d256a@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:50:22 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAEdQ38G5fMWY+vtpuMh0HFxViWLjkLzxD6K=qdXky44--rgKTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38G5fMWY+vtpuMh0HFxViWLjkLzxD6K=qdXky44--rgKTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Package stabilization groups
To: Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>, 
	Tim Harder <radhermit@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 964a509e-45c3-417a-8108-a998746cbffc
X-Archives-Hash: 11ee53a45c3f84f7a0007459a0246551

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:04=E2=80=AFPM Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.or=
g> wrote:
> Now I'll speak from the point of implementer of `pkgdev bugs`. For me I
> think both approaches are good, but I would prefer the latter over the
> former. Nicer syntax, easy cache of all groups, easier to solve the
> "graph problems" in the tool.

Sounds good to me. Should we have infra create a new git repo for us
for this purpose?