From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506791381F3 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 16:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09C18E0A7E; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 16:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 194B7E0969 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 16:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 061C833EB28 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 16:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id k14so1658931qcv.20 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 09:37:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=pPCR3/64GY2JOhqjVyohGTyfwh5er6IMbqQVIG7Fidw=; b=VAECa4ukmt3oDeAuWr5JspZhm0HGoFhtFAI2pRWeV9MHnrkQbovXYLHYNduhvcpxUl WvcfsDHIaLuGYMvv7tFZdRnE/Yz6yQ+VjjeE6wnPNSpCliPQwItCpuYK8I4xUu2mA7gi 296za1RKXX2waAfZl6OL6WBGTSaESAMKPoxUc2ZJlNYPilatfUmJ9kD5W97vchM3fdO0 YkhS7od6tTK9TjqYgRLWYA2+hKy9z/KmcgO7B7M43luQwa3nxvm+vSFywht6oTjBQxeG R2zieQlm7PeIzZ0AqT2wK/xkHwI9dgDpMbB/SDvmWiPwXWS33MDZ2MgxAqEOQZ/0OIRA V0EA== X-Received: by 10.224.183.142 with SMTP id cg14mr11776105qab.27.1373128622431; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 09:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.108.6 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:36:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1373096801.13901.24.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> References: <201307012054.06728.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com> <51D2CB89.9050402@opensource.dyc.edu> <20130702234246.05507806@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <51D722BC.10207@gentoo.org> <20130705194108.08a46f2f@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <51D77E8A.1070108@gentoo.org> <1373096801.13901.24.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> From: Matt Turner Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:36:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 0039acb8-1706-4266-8510-659b21be09e7 X-Archives-Hash: 78228394c1eeaf719fa1e6f4806961a6 On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > Yes, it does need to be rebuilt if key deps are updated. The gcc > produced in the stage1 is broken, so won't run to rebuild itself during > the stage2 run. But we keep the old libs around via preserve_libs, and once stage1 is done we effectively throw the seed stage out.