From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RDhTP-0005i8-87 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:54:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 300D721C187; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C4421C0AB for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13A721B400E for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcge1 with SMTP id e1so938666vcg.40 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.112.135 with SMTP id iq7mr20709586vdb.51.1318359242058; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.184.38 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:53:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E93EB40.7040907@gentoo.org> References: <4E900E3E.2070202@gentoo.org> <4E905C48.20008@gentoo.org> <4E90FBBB.1070309@gentoo.org> <4E9166E1.2050600@gentoo.org> <4E91BC19.1090804@gentoo.org> <4E93EB40.7040907@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:53:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: be2f5ddf8dfb7503226be1a72a302657 On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Markos Chandras wrote: >> Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start >> masking other people's packages? >> > It seems you don't even bother to read the masking message or my > comments on the bug. I said "Talk to QA and CC me if you want to > discuss this further". Did you? Of course I did. And at the time "Talk to QA and CC me" made sense since I thought you were in QA. I don't understand why you'd ask this. > Of course not cause you like trolling publicly. Rather, I'm confused. I wouldn't drop into a bug report about another developer's package and mask it, especially after the temporarily solution was already acked by another developer.