From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72998138334 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A3C8E08A5; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:42:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5054E0893 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-il1-f173.google.com (mail-il1-f173.google.com [209.85.166.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C990A34D850 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:42:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f173.google.com with SMTP id g12so6626501ild.2 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 07:42:10 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/1O1lYrrcShVXfFTlbnu4tONJZ9GwjhHx1I0BPSkcHnDoGgnt S9QYsWxPATAnz6sX+v1whrt7R9o25IYHzLYdwUg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzItXKaLcZFcFISry9ZDlLtjmnWskKf/FCtLWDAhoRdsbljN16aXduqBDSCm3dkkspznHRzQAEs/a1Xv4Wwy5w= X-Received: by 2002:a92:5d03:: with SMTP id r3mr13997017ilb.278.1575646928914; Fri, 06 Dec 2019 07:42:08 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191205160957.576971-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> <067cc5678d1eb4a3445bdf7beefe8c055307eeb4.camel@gentoo.org> <31d2646b48bc35d02ca2a7a0b9db7b634d5b0ef0.camel@gentoo.org> <20191206082325.GA5714@sumac.radhermit.com> <2cf18040c81c4eb0afbbf3282bacb150c80b572f.camel@gentoo.org> <20191206093336.GA6649@sumac.radhermit.com> <20191206115042.11621fd0@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20191206115042.11621fd0@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 10:41:56 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] package.deprecated: Create initial template To: gentoo development Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 079f0928-1a5d-45ee-8936-02b1977e6c84 X-Archives-Hash: 81943d3cce333dae927f4f024d8521af On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500 > Tim Harder wrote: > > > On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;) > > > it will never be perfect but i really like repoman commit to refuse > > > to even commit if there's something obviously wrong > > > > I'm more of the opinion (and am working towards that practicality in > > terms of runtime speed) that a subset of QA checks should be run as a > > git hook which would cause push failures on certain classes of bad > > commits. > > > There should be both. Amending the 23rd commit message because one > mistyped a semicolon is kind of a PITA. It is? git rebase -i HEAD~23 Is that what you think is a pain in the ass, or do you not know about interactive rebase? :)