From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RE8tz-000540-GM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:11:59 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8992D21C1AA; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55C221C063 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vx0-f181.google.com (mail-vx0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E2B61B4004 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbfk14 with SMTP id fk14so1340981vcb.40 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.90.51 with SMTP id bt19mr1500415vdb.34.1318464650110; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.184.38 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E9629A7.3080405@gentoo.org> References: <20111001170259.E4D702004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201110121452.20572.vapier@gentoo.org> <4E9609D7.5070004@gentoo.org> <201110121910.58049.vapier@gentoo.org> <4E96226D.8060807@gentoo.org> <4E9629A7.3080405@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:10:30 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 566131d05fb7b3198f2d672fe66017a1 On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Samuli Suominen wro= te: > On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: >> Mike Frysinger schrieb: >>>> The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. >>> >>> by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. =C2=A0having qutecom in= the tree >>> with a depend on versions that i'm now removing breaks the depgraph. >> >> The depgraph is broken after the old versions are removed, not before. > > I'm not sure if you should have gentoo-x86 access anymore... This is scar= y. Come on. That's ridiculous, and nothing but trolling. Don't do that. Like in the pngcrush thread, miscommunications all around. Matt