From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59287-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1E5138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:25:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E103E0843;
	Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:25:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA8A9E0810
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:25:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com (mail-qa0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1D7733D3D2
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:25:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id hu16so2024781qab.14
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.209.193 with SMTP id gh1mr2449406qab.86.1364156737114;
 Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.35.37 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <514F1120.7080001@gentoo.org>
References: <514CE62A.4090605@gentoo.org> <kilfpu$eut$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <CAG2jQ8i+1cLa14Pd-VYyudFVnFv9yJGgc+t+rkrHWUFwm2z7DA@mail.gmail.com>
 <kilka6$i2v$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAG2jQ8jkDv8o2ty=of_x+CmRwkbxqmxzRfgNp_Dd8GLkMc5NvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <kimrvo$11i$1@ger.gmane.org> <514F1120.7080001@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:25:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38EuDSVFWGi+EPxcoC13RxR8cDvoG5KoEnehUcBwvy-+yg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: e68a9800-d0c4-434c-96cc-352255a93f89
X-Archives-Hash: 614b93f6376909d60180a4e397bed626

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
> discussion again?

Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it
could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future
hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy.