From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNVGO-0004Km-9v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:26:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C738CE0700; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:25:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0947CE0512 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com (mail-pb0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E0511B4015 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 20:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so155649pbb.40 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.213.200 with SMTP id nu8mr5711293pbc.59.1335471912662; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:25:12 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.136.73 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:24:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120426170645.7cf0b268@gentoo.org> References: <20120424201246.A791C2004B@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20120425230408.497a6ca4.dirtyepic@gentoo.org> <20120426180004.65f0f2eb@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <20120426170125.GA30041@odin.qasl.de> <20120426170645.7cf0b268@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:24:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/adobe-flash: metadata.xml adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild ChangeLog To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 68f0e00f-1739-40f8-94d4-c0c902782154 X-Archives-Hash: dcdfddb696f7a3fbc23a3cd0193899a1 On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > wouldnt adding a sse2 useflag and putting it in REQUIRED_USE solve the > problem ? > > afaik portage wont even try to upgrade if people have -sse2 If that works, which I think it will, that does sound like the best thing to do.